Search results

We are just discussing the principled positions. Jacob's treasure/possessions/belonging and status consists of ethical/moral/spiritual; he left no legacy of worldly possessions. The same could be said of Isaac and Abraham. The legacy of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was only ethical, moral...

Jesus never claimed to be a Christian; he was a Jew. Abraham was not a Jew as he had passed long ago. That is the correct position. Regards

G-d = 7_4 Is it mentioned by Moses. What is its religious or ethical, moral or spiritual significance? Regards

G-d's choice is never racial but on grace based on spiritual merit. Judah cannot claim any spiritual inheritance from Abraham when he committed the wrong of selling his brother Joseph. Abraham does not need to share such wrongs committed by his offspring; so Abraham had nothing to do with Judah...

Please provide an account/detail of the same with reference. Regards

Abraham was never a Jew. He happened much before. The ancestors don't get any name from their off-spring. Regards

Jacob owned no land; so there was nothing to be divided among his children. Was there any? Please Regards

Morally it is wrong to say that Abraham was a Jew or Jewish. Regards

Was not Judah involved in the conspiracy to sell Joseph as a slave? Regards

The treasure of Jacob (titled Israel) was spiritual wealth; he owned no territory to rule or to be inherited by his off-spring after his death. Did he? There is/was therefore no land to be called Land of Israel. Your thought please. Regards