Search results

lmao. sure, the subconscious can create masterpieces, sure sure sure, sure... lol. sadler's subsconciousness had next to nothing similar to URANTIA; he thought and believed and behaved differently: next to nothing similar to the URANTIA ideals and values and ideas in his professional career...

(¿) (¿) GOD as fragments can know they are GOD: Adjusters have minds. URANTIA: Thomas said again: That's totally false, again; we are conscious, we are not puppets, and the TAs are GOD, not at all anonynous. you don't know how much i understand the Bible and the abrahamic 'traditions': you...

Yes, completed and certified, and also a third presentation of URANTIA before its publication in october 1955, but not through the good revelatiors: the third one was by the devil, totally documented by ernest moyer in his book: http://ubannotated.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/MoyerBirthRev.pdf...

This is totally False again (i'll answer your 'issue with' URANTIA later on): URANTIA describes and explains exactly what you say URANTIA supposedly doesn't, only much better: the union between the infinite and the finite, etc. URANTIA talks about the actual fusion between each human and a...

Our spiritual receptivity capacity in the present moment is not unlimited; it requires help, mediation, evolution, adjustments (URANTIA's Thought Adjusters' concept): '48:7.5 3. Inherent capacities cannot be exceeded; a pint can never hold a quart. The spirit concept cannot be mechanically...

Nah, you don't know all of world history, that's a fact, much less occult history etc¿; i dont claim to know all of history. URANTIA doesn't gives us all of our world history: why would you want a book that covers so much of it, including plotinus and iamblichus, when you can't with a book of...

Also, addressing the your above claim, we don't know all about the TRINITY concept in acient Egypt, India, and with Buddhism, or do you? The Egyptians were descended from Atlantis, and although Atlantis is not addressed in URANTIA, Atlantis sure had some, primitive (or even advanced¿) concepts...

Yes, different than archangels, right¿ Let's leave it at that, you don't seem to care about a serious divine revelation; and i don't care that you care either, with all due respect, so i stop here, unless you have good and incontestable refutations against The Urantia Papers...

OK, we can see you don't know anything about URANTIA. URANTIA is not racist: http://ubannotated.com/main-menu/animated/Topical Studies/ Also it does not always reflect the '1930's': And example of URANTIA's advanced science ahead of its time, acknowledging that its cosmology (science) is not...

NO: i don't only have faith in it; i know what i know coz i have thoroughly researched and understood URANTIA and much more... see???.

https://www.urantia.org/learn-about-urantia-book also: https://squarecircles.com/frequently-asked-questions/

FALSE again: URANTIA never identifies MICHAEL (JESUS) with any archangel, but it does say in two places (only): the 'archangel of MICHAEL':

FALSE: they are not the same transmission method; even a follower of Cayce would tell you URANTIA is different; but anyway i have studied both and they are different. i said almost zero; and yeah i stand by what i claim positively and truthfully... there's nothing mundane in URANTIA... as the...

URANTIA has almost zero similarities to adventism; and its criticisms of christianity are original, but we don't know how much, except for some unoriginal, of course, but you don't claim to know this when you haven't read all of URANTIA, do you¿.

Not 'thank you': my mistake: i wanted to ask the query: Where is the plagiarism in URANTIA???: yes there a few verbatim words or phrases in it, from human sources, but the rest is rephrased, or even actually changed. yes there is a way to know how much of the JESUS Papers are original: look up...

Not humans named, as the URANTIA revelators/authors wanted: And URANTIA is not like any cults of the time nor similar to Cayce, at all whatsoever...

Where is the plagiarism in URANTIA: yes there a few verbatim words or phrases in it, from human sources, but the rest is rephrased, or even actually changed, and enhanced; URANTIA factually told us they acknowledged human sources:

FALSE FALSE FALSE: There is, there is: the revelators/authors identify themselves, sometimes by type (order) of being, other times by both name and type; one only has to go to the URANTIA titles of the Papers to see this very aspect... Matthew Block, who sourced almost all The Urantia Papers...

both are; i'm not gonna read both channelings for you, why don't you investigate more, or don't do it if you don't want to.