Search results

Hell comes along if holding wrong views, act agains good priests and monks, act in accordance with wrong view. No prayer, no God can help fools. They see bad in good and good in bad. Perceive helpful as hostility, destructive as helpful. And as no goodness fond withing, delight in intoxication...

Well, if desire such existence, thinking animal have no problems, than good householder already walk the way toward such.

Things aren't solved or changed through others, good householder. And monks, who follow the good way, don't either beg or pray, nor cheat by giving blessings, but simply, if there is a possibility tell of what's good to not do, good to do, for long term happiness for the actor.

There are many fairytales out there, yes. They are usually consumed by drunkards and within their environments. As if the Sublime Buddha had anything to blame when calling a fool a fool, to teach either him or more fortuned others around. Of course he wasn't the way drunkard defilements would...

Just from other software, but maybe similar: In the single user permission might be such as "primary membership", which then get displayed, here and there, good Brian.

There are Gods and deities, and there are existences in Hell, and drinking intoxications means not following ways leading to heavens and the Brahmas, but straight to hell. Why? Because one loses the capability to keep foremost the important, and fear of wrong doing, in mind, grows more and more...

Yes, it's terrible wrong, to take intoxications causing shamelessness and lack of concern. And yes, as long as not seeing the fault and make efforts to abound such, your is someone fallen into a fault, not able to progress further, but heading downwardly. Just may good householder look at...

Duo such is pretty foolish...

Ant and cats gain Samadhi even quicker and longer, good householder, and are likewise unaware of their bond. Every existence every moment requires Samadhi. But to gain wisdom and liberation right, Samma Samadhi is required, which reqires right mindfulness,... right effort... livelihood...

Disciples of the Buddha recognize, even meet up with all kinds of Brahmas and Devas, good householder. Some are even disciples, some even already Noble Ones, and Non-returner. Most delight in discussing and listening to the teachings. It was on account of Mahabrahma, who begged the Sublime...

It's not good to speak on things of what one does neither know nor understand. "There are Gods and deities" eg. more refined realms of existence, is a factor of right view. Somebody who denied such or isn't willing to take it on faith, is neither capable to reach any good concentration nor reach...

Philosopher believe and constructs all kind of ideas to justify their ways, good householder. God are just Gods, and can be Noble or not. Most deities wouldn't teach anybody if not having good virtues and strong attached to sensuality. There isn't any teaching that wouldn't be refuted, if not...

Specualations of the doubtful, not willing to surrender and listen to those with knowing&seeing. And at large just about is or isn't instead of should and shouldn't do, for long term happiness.

That's not serious, good householder. Just seeking food for wandering on.

Trash. Nobody wouldn't fix yours. Lokayatika Sutta: The Cosmologist

Philosophy nurishes on because neither real not liberating.

So good householder needs to wait till sickness, dispear lose and death approach near to prove if it was worthy to hold on a dream and so much good time to work ways out good wasted. What's the doubt with seeing the dream isn't? Doubting what?

What's the worthy of idealistic dreaming? Things arise and decay on causes. Ideal isn't in the frame of the six senses, yet there is a ideal path of practice leading there, good householder. As for vision, one can just perceive of what one has met: if having touched ideal, nothing could sake...

What's wrong with not just acting defensive (suicidal), defending, or even neither of both, not offensive (becoming) as well? Eg. just soberly (which might be perceived as the other extreme, if just knowing one or the other). Suspecting certain, without being able to read mind, might be a not so...

No, it isn't, it's simple and sure. Maybe good householder confuses "like and dislike" with "right and wrong". This moment liking, the next hating... that's normal worldly thing, which newer could be generalized for common folk: eg. demo-crazy and pseudo-liberalism. And where is there and end or...