Anger

[seattlegal]

Originally Posted by Netti-Netti

The intensity of anger - like blind rage - does not obscure the less strong emotions?

Also, how does quieting the other emotions help quiet the anger?

You explained this yourself in your previous post:

Originally Posted by Netti-Netti

The most angry and unhappy people on the planet are unable to see the world for what it is. That is, they see things in light of their own desires, which in effect means they see things in light of their personal disappointments, assumptions of narcissistic entitlement, and irrational sense of having been cheated or deprived.

The stronger emotion of optimized or transformed anger can cut through the delusions caused by desire and pride so you can see things as they are, not as you desire them to be, so you can take the correct actions needed.

[Netti-Netti]

Originally Posted by seattlegal

The stronger emotion of optimized or transformed anger can cut through the delusions caused by desire and pride so you can see things as they are, not as you desire them to be, so you can take the correct actions needed.

Yes, I think when we get frustrated enough with our situation to do something about it, we will indeed make creative use of anger, as you describe, and get very good results.


Perhaps we can see anger as part of a Hate/Aversion/Anger constellation:

In order to attain freedom from craving, its nature has to be clearly seen into, at root, and with that is clearly seen the folly of performing unskillful actions. We then realize that we are all based on Delusion/Ignorance (Moha), Greed/Desire (Lobha), and Hate/Aversion/Anger (Dosa), in short on the Three Fires...(W)e first refrain from acting unskillfully and in due course the very temptation to act in this way ceases because the Fires become exhausted from lack of fuel.

http://www.sukhi.com/truths.htm

Desire is the cause of Dukkha. But we don't want to get rid of desire. Why? Because we need desire to keep going with our spiritual aspirations and devote ourselves to our spiritual friends.

So lets keep desire, but let's make it work for us in accordance with the Spirit of Awakening.

[Netti-Netti]

Originally Posted by Vajradhara

when you are angry is your anger focused on the object or person that caused the anger to arise or on the reasons that such an object or person would cause you to be angry?

Maybe a third option: focus on self due to shame about having become angry or possibly due to guilt in connection with an action one would not have committed were it not for anger.

[Netti-Netti]

Originally Posted by seattlegal

Anger is a stronger emotion than pride or desire. Once you understand this, you can use it as a means to quiet the other emotions in order to see the situation clearly, without having to resort to the 'heavy handed approach' of blinding rage.

The conscious decision to use anger constructively and proactively is arguably most powerful element in this scenario and involves both clarity and self-control. The mind is taming the emotions.

There have been several places where I've noted that Buddhist texts often use the term emotion and thought as though they are interchangeable. As it turns out, this is a recognized controversy. In one article, the authors went into some detail as to why they ended up going with one or the other term when translating from the Pali scriptures.

But not to get to far afield here. I don't see pride as just an emotion. I see it as a mistaken attitude. In Biblical terms, it is a form of idolatry and in that sense, could be considered wrong belief.

In the Buddhist view, everything starts with mind. We generate various emotions with our thoughts. There are various emotion-thought parcels that usually co-occur, but the thoughts seem more imprtant than the emotions. Emotions go away when we overcome the thoughts. That's why I underscored the function of negative thinking and false hopes in a previous post.

The dislocation of life is due a misdirection of desire because of faulty thinking. The relationshiop to the world changes -- and so do the negative emotions that arise from a dysfunctional relationship -- when you change the underlying cognitions, attitudes, and beliefs.

I think the key is to change our orientation toward the world (referenced as "self-centered approach") - like the idea that the world is just a consumer paradise full of objects for us to possess or control and being angry with the world when it is not forthcoming with what we want.

[Netti-Netti]

I thought this was an interesting real life example of how someone might use anger as a smokescreen to avoid self-confrontation:

Some time ago I became acquainted with a Caucasian Buddhist who for several years had made a daily practice of meditating on love. He confided that he had chosen this meditation subject because he was prone to frequent outbreaks of anger and chronic resentment; a "hate problem" he termed it. But despite years of meditation, the hatred had not diminished; the meditation had failed. Why?

As our acquaintance broadened the answer became apparent. My friend had several poorly-concealed intellectual and emotional deficiencies. He never once revealed that he acknowledged these; on the contrary, he displayed frequent attempts to bolster his self-image. Such attempts were invariably doomed to frustration, especially when his accomplishments and social poise were contrasted with those of others. By reacting with anger towards others he avoided the unpleasantry of looking at himself. In other words, his anger was a psychological defense through which he sought to maintain an illusion of self-esteem. Thus unconsciously he did not wish to relinquish his anger. To do so would be too painful, and to attack the anger by meditating on love was futile, for anger was only a symptom. The real problem lay much deeper.

To cure such hatred requires three things. First one must become aware of the existence of one's inadequacies and their accompanying humiliations; in other words, what is unconscious must become conscious. Second one must totally confront such unpleasant feelings and acknowledge them in their entirety. And finally one must relinquish the egotistical desire for self-exaltation. This last requirement is best achieved by objectively analyzing the illusion of self and gaining full appreciation for the changing and compounded nature of the personality. In other words, one must acquire insight of both types discussed above under the goals of meditation.

Buddhist Meditation and Depth Psychology

[Francis king]

exactly...

[Netti-Netti]

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you're the one who gets burned."
~the Buddha

[17th Angel]

Originally Posted by Netti-Netti

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you're the one who gets burned."
~the Buddha

But if your aim is true and your accuracy is on.... Get the other dude in the eye... Gonna be worth it. Yew knew... Like how most people.. (yes I am sticking with the word MOST.) Most people if they are hurt or down on their luck or whatnot... To see another worse then them makes it feel, alllllll better.... So to some I think they are willing to take the risk of self inflicted damage.

[Netti-Netti]

Originally Posted by Alex P

.... So to some I think they are willing to take the risk of self inflicted damage.

Or maybe they decide the self inflicted damage is actually worth it.

[Will be]

Anger is one form of shempa that I use less seriously now a days. So much of it is wasted energy, or added bad karma.

So, in this life, one of my major goals, for today, for right now is to drop the anger, and that first comes with choosing silence over words, over any words.

Oh... mmm... I love the sound of silence.

I just look outside, and three deer silently pass by.

Silence opens all the doors of perception, that have remained closed, shut by anger.

[nativeastral]

underlying anger is fear underlying fear is love

[Will be]

My first anger this morning, or I should write "the" first angry thought this morning, after waking up was in being told to do something by my wife. I was going to do something my way, I meant "the" way, but let it go to disengage conflict. Plus, I hadn't had my coffee yet. She must be Jesus, I meant "Buddha", that's always possible, to follow after.

[nativeastral]

shouldn't that be 'the' wife?

[Will be]

Originally Posted by nativeastral

shouldn't that be 'the' wife?

I'll think about it. I meant, feel about it. Oops, a, well yeah. I just got angry, and let it go, or her go.

I need that second cup of coffee!

[Will be]

My tummy is yelling for food, all angry like.