Another Buddha??

[Vajradhara]

Namaste Bishadi,

thank you for the post.

Originally Posted by Bishadi

If I go outside, dig a hole and plant a tree; Is there energy involved? Did I contribute my energy to begin a chain of events that may cause a life to live beyond the term of my life?

i recall asking you to elaborate on how it is that such things you listed in your previous post were related to energy transference. i'm not clear how asking me to explain your point is going to help with that.

Well dharma is simply learned rules based on a faith placed into writing. What was believed way back when is conveyed and that energy continues as if alive all by itself

as noted the definition of Dharma is rather intricately connected with the context in which it is being used. i'm unclear how you are referring to it here, can you elaborate a bit? please bear in mind the previous definition of the term.

Not interested in recognition. Only that the truth lives. Them to know, will do as they are to by choice, not because others or the group approves.

submit your work anonymously then.

me no spacetime creator either

i'm not sure what you are saying here. are you saying that you, personally, aren't the creator of spacetime? are you saying that you don't believe that spacetime has or had a creator?

nothing sentient other than a human being (conscious) unless life as scientifically defined, itself is considered sentient….

you do not think that animals, insects and birds are sentient?

And EPR had nothing to do with Quantum entanglement.

that is, precisely, what it demonstrated. the "E" <Einstein> even termed it "spooky action at a distance." it was Niels Bohr that and the Copenhagen interpetation of QM that dealt with particle spin. we've actually covered this topic in the Science section of the forum which may be of some interest to you.

to get back on point.. i'd still like for you to explain what you mean by energy transference between art and poetry and the like.

further, how any sort of non-sentient things, like gravity and such, can be considered God and why such a consideration is of relevance to beings that have a world view where no creator deity exists?

metta,

~v

[Bishadi]

Originally Posted by Vajradhara

i recall asking you to elaborate on how it is that such things you listed in your previous post were related to energy transference. i'm not clear how asking me to explain your point is going to help with that.

I asked you if I plant a tree, di I contribute energy for that life to continue; which logically ... that tree will live beyind my life; so literally a life continued based on my choice....

all you had to say was yes or no...

submit your work anonymously then.

have and do all over the world.... most every minute awake.

just not the math......

i'm not sure what you are saying here. are you saying that you, personally, aren't the creator of spacetime? are you saying that you don't believe that spacetime has or had a creator?

Spacetime is incorrect; mathematically....

you do not think that animals, insects and birds are sentient?

Please reread the line written.... consciousness is oooosually what folk mean by sentient, although living things do abuse entropy as well.

that is, precisely, what it demonstrated. the "E" <Einstein> even termed it "spooky action at a distance." it was Niels Bohr that and the Copenhagen interpetation of QM that dealt with particle spin.

Angular momentum ?

As it is this application to 'l' by planck that ruins all of physics. That angular mometum is a huge error, conflicting with any 'wave' analogy to energy. e=hv is ruined by the usage of 'torque' by angular momentum.

And please, there is no ether... either

Where I am going with this is that 2 like 'f' systems can combine increasing the potential greater than the 2 added separately. This reality cannot be accomplished with walking the planck.

to get back on point.. i'd still like for you to explain what you mean by energy transference between art and poetry and the like.

If I wrote a beautiful poem, 20k yrs back, could you feel from the words you read, what I felt.

further, how any sort of non-sentient things, like gravity and such, can be considered God and why such a consideration is of relevance to beings that have a world view where no creator deity exists?

We are creators as conscious beings; we can create words.

Gravity is entangled energy between mass.

Love simply reflects the entanglement of everything (gravity) as nothing can be isolated from existence, thereby all mass is entangled by energy (light).

Now to have 2 mass structures exchange, increasing the entanglement of energy, then a recognized phenomenon often described as Love can exist.

Kind of a spooky action at a distance.... isn't it..