Interafaith: Comparative religion: world religions

Go Back   Interfaith forums > Secularism > Philosophy

Philosophy General philosophy: metaphysics, ethics, the Enlightenment, and the human experience.

Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 06-15-2009, 01:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 427
coberst is on a distinguished road
Does baked-in bias (ideology) always win?

Does baked-in bias (ideology) always win?

Let’s examine one of the most perplexing and potentially dangerous problems that the world now faces.

Nuclear proliferation is high on the priority list facing Obama. The problem the haves (those who now have nuclear weapons) have is preventing the have-nots from becoming a member of the haves.

It is apparent to me that any fair-minded individual must recognize as fact that every nation will logically seek to obtain nuclear weapons and that every nation that has such weapons already, will seek to deter such a happening.

Fair-mindedness is the corner-stone of CT (Critical Thinking). Without fair-mindedness there is no Critical Thinking.

To be fair-minded one must be vigilant (consciousness plus intention) of the need to treat all viewpoints alike. This demands that we adhere to intellectual standards such as accuracy and sound reasoning, which are unaffected by self-interest.

A contrast with fair-mindedness is intellectual self-centeredness.

Fair-mindedness is a challenging task that demands a family of character traits: intellectual humility, courage, empathy, honesty, perseverance, and a confidence in the value of reason.

Our culture places maximum value not on fair-mindedness but upon self-interest, and maximizing production, and consumption.

Intellectual humility begins with the recognition that absolute certainty regarding any matter of fact is beyond human capacity. There exists no mind-independent reality that we have the capacity to know. We can know only that which is “colored” by our experiences and historical perspective.

Our common sense views, coupled with philosophical tradition and religious dogma, all teach us that such is not the case, that we can find absolute certainty. This cultural tradition works aggressively against our goal of intellectual humility thus demanding that we must become more intellectually sophisticated in order to gain the level of intellectual humility required.

Intellectual courage is a difficult assignment. We all tend to place great value on our own opinion, which is more often than not just something that we grabbed as it flew by. But this is even more of a problem when we are “wedded” to something that we have a strong commitment to, for what ever reason. Our political affiliation is one example.

Intellectual courage is especially difficult, and even dangerous to our well being when we hold ideas that society considers them to be dangerous; even though we are confident that they are rationally grounded. Society often punishes severely all forms of nonconformity; the execution of Socrates by the citizens of Athens might serve as a good example.

By developing this character trait of intellectual courage we will often be ostracized from a group or even a large community. Such an experience will give us incentive to recognize that most people live their lives in such a manner as to be secure in the middle of the approval of those about us.

Intellectual courage ain’t for sissies!

Intellectual empathy is a consciousness that one must engage the imagination in an effort to intellectually place your self into the shoes of another so as to comprehend that other person as well as possible. To accomplish this transaction we must try to learn as much as possible about the other person’s situation so as to reconstruct that person’s assumptions, premises, and ideas.

It appears to me that civilization is presently constructed on the firm foundation of baked-in bias, that is to say that religion forms the foundation of today’s civilization. If this is correct one might ask the question ‘can we construct a world on a foundation of reason when we begin with a world where the understanding of and confidence in reason is seldom observed’?

Many of these ideas were gleaned from the book Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life by Richard Paul and Linda Elder
coberst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 02:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Interfaith Forums
Tao_Equus's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, scotland
Posts: 5,826
Tao_Equus is a jewel in the roughTao_Equus is a jewel in the roughTao_Equus is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via Skype™ to Tao_Equus
Re: Does baked-in bias (ideology) always win?

Does a critical barsteward like me by definition have to be a critical thinker? You would not know? Because you never engage with any of us outside your visits to post your own choice of extracts. Where, pray tell me , is the humility in that?
Tao_Equus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2009, 09:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
wil's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: a figment of your imagination
Posts: 14,154
wil is a name known to allwil is a name known to allwil is a name known to allwil is a name known to allwil is a name known to allwil is a name known to all
Re: Does baked-in bias (ideology) always win?

Obama’s Science Pick: A Violent Enemy of Human Life The American Catholic

Does this fit here? Or should I call up Nick A?
wil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 12:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
Interfaith Forums
Tao_Equus's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, scotland
Posts: 5,826
Tao_Equus is a jewel in the roughTao_Equus is a jewel in the roughTao_Equus is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via Skype™ to Tao_Equus
Re: Does baked-in bias (ideology) always win?

Originally Posted by wil View Post
Social Darwinism ! It's one hell of an accusation, and I want to know if he did write that and in what context. Mostly because I could not trust anything coming out of a Catholic propaganda vessel at face value. Wiki says he was a co-author... but cannot find enough from any other source to know the context. The article has an obvious legal backdoor in 'questioning' the validity of source... so they can disclaim it. I cannot trust that. Not from them.
Tao_Equus is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do we (Muslims, Christians and Jews) believe in the same God or not? Muhammad-Khalifa Abrahamic Religions 365 12-27-2009 10:03 PM
Is ideology the bane of intellectual sophistication in the US? coberst Philosophy 0 06-12-2009 01:01 PM
Why is ideology like a prism? coberst Philosophy 28 04-09-2009 04:00 AM
Can a sophisticated individual rise above ideology? coberst Philosophy 12 04-04-2009 01:58 PM
Foundation?? Dor Christianity 23 05-11-2006 02:28 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.