Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Postmaster
Whereas Greek Orthodoxy is one of the oldest and original form of the Christian faith.
|
I've posted on a couple of threads before that
if I were a practicing Christian, I would likely be Eastern Orthodox. I have always attended the local Greek Festivals with
more than a passing, or surface interest, and my favorite part has always been the Sanctuary tour & explanation. Even when it was the same I'd heard year after year, I would look forward to this. And I can't say I know the history of Eastern Orthodoxy
that well, nor do I know a great deal about pre-Christian Judaism.
However,
I am familiar with the idea of the
Holy of Holies, and even if part of my inroads were made via a fascination with the
Knights Templar, it has inevitably led me to the same place/realizations. I have perused copies of
Schwaller de Lubicz's
Temple in Man, and Temple of Man (the latter being better known). And even Hollywood, through such movies as the
Indiana Jones series (among many, many others), has familiarized us with the importance, and some of the history, of the
Ark of the Covenant. I think it was only actually in recent years that I ever really understood the significance of what this
box was/is ... and I have watched with fascination the various TV specials in which the Ark has even been traced to a Temple in Ethiopia (?), which
may well be the current "resting place."
All of this,
even Egyptian architecture, is intimately tied together for me, and not arbitrarily ... for it finally dawned on me recently,
just how similar many of the practices of Eastern Orthodox Christianity are -
to Judaism! I was thinking in particular of the Holy of Holies, and I remain enthusiastic about the idea - that the church is laid out, so as to mirror for us,
in many, many ways, our "interior architecture," or spiritual constitution. And I mean this even more literally than
St. Teresa of Avila's Interior Castle! The works by Schwaller de Lubicz, if studied, can amply demonstrate this - and yet, they are by no means the totality of the revelation.
I could say a thing or two about icons, though less so from personal experience, and more from the perspective of a commentator. I have several of my own (though nothing famous, and mostly quite small). I know almost
nothing about the history, and various styles, yet I do ... just intuitively, think I understand something of their purpose, and function. So it always amazes me, even disturbs me, when people fail to grasp their role, and usefulness. It makes me wish that
every single person who attends the local Greek Festival, might also take the time to do the free Sanctuary tour, instead of just getting drunk and eating baklava.

But, of course, live & let live.
I believe that the same individuality who was Mary, the Mother of Jesus, is
active in the world today, just as is the Christ. I think that, while some do not understand, and/or would dismiss various "miracles" - either as an overactive imagination, as frauds, or as no more than
visions - I remain utterly convinced that
many are quite genuine (not as miracles, but as the activity of
Mary, and of the
Angelic Kingdom), and serve a vital purpose. More and more cooperation with the
Devas, or `Angels,' lies ahead ... although I can't comment on it from a genuinely
Eastern Orthodox perspective. I do think, that among traditions (and in cultures) where there is stronger faith, and fewer materialistic tendencies, folks might have an
easier time ... accepting the changes taking place.
andreas