Interafaith: Comparative religion: world religions

Go Back   Interfaith forums > Secularism > Philosophy

Philosophy General philosophy: metaphysics, ethics, the Enlightenment, and the human experience.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 10-25-2008, 08:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 427
coberst is on a distinguished road
Greenspan’s Faith: Ideology trumps Science

Greenspan’s Faith: Ideology trumps Science

American novelist Walker Percy observed, “As long as I am getting rich, I feel well. It is my Presbyterian blood.”

“When a man seeks to accommodate science to a viewpoint which is derived not from science itself (however erroneous it might be) but from the outside, from alien, external interests, then I call him base.” Marx

I claim that Greenspan shares a significant responsibility for our economic collapse because he was a trusted guru who twisted the social economic theories of capitalism into an ideological form that is often referred to as laissez-fair capitalism.

A base writer is one who lacks professional integrity. A base writer is primarily, perhaps only, interested in reaching a partisan conclusion regardless of the scientific theory.


There are two types of base writers: there is the ‘hired-gun’ who has no intellectual convictions but uses her talents in the service of the highest bidder; then there is the writer with strong intellectual convictions and strong biases who uses her talents to distort facts to fit her faith.

“For Marx, then, the ‘base’ writers have no intellectual integrity…It is evident in the way they ignore counterevidence, select some and suppress other facts, twist their arguments to reach the desired conclusions, and so on.”

Marx also elaborates on another kind of apologist. The vulgar writer is a superficial philistine confining himself to the surface of society, unwilling to dig any deeper. “If there were no difference between essence and appearance, there would be no need for science…Marx argues that the task of the scientist is to analyze the phenomenal forms of an entity, elucidate its essential nature and tendencies, and use the knowledge so acquired to explain its phenomenal behavior.”

I think that Greenspan is a “base” official who is “vulgar” in his management. That is to say that Greenspan is plagued with what might be called “apologetic dread”; that truth might well turn out go be unpalatable to him. This is the dread “found not only among the economists but also among the philosophers, the historians, the political theorists and others, and further, that they may be not only conservative but also radical in their political biases.”

I think that the American culture is ideologically constituted in such an extent that whoever lacks sophisticated critical thinking skills is condemned to becoming an apologist. I also think that even those with sophisticated critical thinking skills, such as I assume Greenspan to have, are greatly influenced by a desire to be loved and respected by all apologists and uncritical society in general.

coberst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 09:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb
 
juantoo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 6,475
juantoo3 is a jewel in the roughjuantoo3 is a jewel in the roughjuantoo3 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Greenspan’s Faith: Ideology trumps Science

OK, so since Greenspan served under a Democratic President *and* a Republican President, I suppose that means we should vote for "nobody." That way we can have our cake and eat it too.
juantoo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 09:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Interfaith Forums
 
Tao_Equus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, scotland
Posts: 5,826
Tao_Equus is a jewel in the roughTao_Equus is a jewel in the roughTao_Equus is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via Skype™ to Tao_Equus
Re: Greenspan’s Faith: Ideology trumps Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by juantoo3 View Post
OK, so since Greenspan served under a Democratic President *and* a Republican President, I suppose that means we should vote for "nobody." That way we can have our cake and eat it too.
That is one way to look at it. The other way is they are both the same party anyway and your vote is a joke. They both serve the banks and corporations. Not you or any other Joe Ordinary.

Oxfam says that just 10% of the money the US government has thrown to the bankers would completely eradicate hunger, provide shelter and clean water for everybody in the developing world that is currently assessed as in need of these basics. Now what are the priorities of the politicians when they are willing to throw bankers 10x what would solve the biggest and most perennial injustice of the past 50 years?

tao
Tao_Equus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2008, 10:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 427
coberst is on a distinguished road
Re: Greenspan’s Faith: Ideology trumps Science

Article from Washington Post

Greenspan Says He Was Wrong On Regulation
Lawmakers Blast Former Fed Chairman

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/23/AR2008102300193.html?hpid=topnews

Alan Greenspan, once viewed as the infallible architect of U.S. prosperity, was called on the carpet yesterday, pilloried by a congressional committee for decisions that contributed to the financial crisis devastating world markets.

The former chairman of the Federal Reserve said the crisis had shaken his very understanding of how markets work, and agreed that certain financial derivatives should be regulated -- an idea he had long resisted.

When he stepped down as Fed chairman less than three years ago, Congress treated Greenspan as an oracle, one of the great economic statesmen of all time. Yesterday, many members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee treated him as a hostile witness.
coberst is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reasoning faith Thomas Belief and Spirituality 47 12-03-2007 12:05 AM
faith and works kenod Christianity 26 09-22-2006 01:18 PM
Science, the religion okieinexile An Okie in Exile 11 05-12-2006 02:32 AM
Faith is exempt from reason? presser_kun Belief and Spirituality 19 01-25-2006 12:17 PM
Science and Faith I, Brian Belief and Spirituality 32 06-19-2005 08:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.