Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seattlegal
Like I said, you might want to contemplate the entire chapter that Peter has written, and carefully consider the message contained therein. 
|
That sounds nebulous. If you do not make a point, then how can it be refuted or even discussed? With all due respect, that seems evasive.
I would welcome hearing specific talking points that affirm that 2 Peter supports that Paul was considered to be an apostle by Peter (or at least by the author of 2 Peter since many scholars view the book as a pseudograph).