A comparison of Bible texts that refer to the holy spirit shows that it is spoken of as ‘filling’ people; they can be ‘baptized’ with it; and they can be "anointed" with it. (Luke 1:41; Matt. 3:11; Acts 10:38) None of these expressions would be appropriate if the holy spirit were a person.
I'm learning new things Mee, talk about Jesus from a J.W. point of view.
as this thread is about the holy spirit i better keep it on track , or i will be in trouble .....again......
The correct identification of the holy spirit must fit allthescriptures that refer to that spirit. With this viewpoint, it is logical to conclude that the holy spirit is the active force of God. It is not a person but is a powerful force that God causes to emanate from himself to accomplish his holy will.—Ps. 104:30; 2 Pet. 1:21; Acts 4:31.
as this thread is about the holy spirit i better keep it on track , or i will be in trouble .....again......
The correct identification of the holy spirit must fit allthescriptures that refer to that spirit. With this viewpoint, it is logical to conclude that the holy spirit is the active force of God. It is not a person but is a powerful force that God causes to emanate from himself to accomplish his holy will.—Ps. 104:30; 2 Pet. 1:21; Acts 4:31.
naw, not in trouble, just a pain in the...well sometimes.
Do not you see?
WHO is in your Heart?
When Jesus left our Helper, he left the Holy Spirit which is a part of himself. Yes, maybe in Genesis it could be percieved as a "force", but we are talking New Testament here.