Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno's logic
Questions,
How can there be space, matter and motion, gravity, electromagnetism and heat, life, thoughts and emotions, freewill, mind and spirit? What is the cause of these things? They are all connected but how? What is the one thing that exists that all of these things have in common? Are these things of God? What then does God exist in? “Did God Create himself? Did God create the space he exists in? Is it possible that there is one thing already existing that connects all of these things, God included, and is also the cause of all of these things?
|
Here's the problem:
Infinity is liar's paradox. Picture Escher's
Drawing Hands. Which hand draws first? Neither and both. Forever. So where is the First Cause within an enclosed, fully networked, causal sphere like the logical world within the
Drawing Hands? It must be a quantum leap in perspective away, outside the world contained within the drawing, in the artist's perspective. We can leap back and forth between these two perspectives easily. In order to make the illusion of infinity work there has to be an essential discontinuity that separates the inviolate perspective from outside the paradox: that of the artist eye view, from the self-referential "logic" of a point of view immersed within the drawing. One cannot climb out of such a paradox from within because there's never a last or first hand. It's hands all the way up and down to infinity. That's where the illusion of a closed causal system begins. There is a similar discontinuity which separates the classical and quantum "worlds." Our reality sphere seems to be a self contained causal system, but that is an illusion created by the self-referential nature of the paradox. Like the hands drawing each other, the First Cause in a classical system can never be found within the system. Godel demonstrated that any attempt to create a paradox-free mathematical system is doomed to fail if that system is reasonably complex. Any system of reasonable richness can either be complete but inconsistent, or consistent but incomplete, but never both.
Chris