Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Penguin
Hi Quahom,
Thanks for the link reference. They are in themselves nice images but they portray jesus as being white again. I have always thought the main reason for him being portrayed as white looking was catholics wanting him to appear this way in images as they didn’t want him to look his true skin pigmentation, that it was more “acceptable” for him to look this way. It is impossible for him not to have been olive skinned/arab looking, and also, as well as he had long hair it would have been quite a tight, curly sort of style similar to the jewish tradition of wearing it but longer. His hair wouldn’t have been the long, thin, flowing type depicted in a lot of images, as again, it wouldn’t have been in his make up to have this sort of hair. What I want to know I guess is where exactly this essential image of jesus having to appear to be white looking came from? Was it catholics changing things or something else? I know people would say it’s irrelevant but I would like to know for myself . Many thanks.
|
Dude, I'm of Irish heritage, and my skin is a ruddy color, but I'm called "white". Spanish, Italian, French, Maltese, all have a kind of "olive" skin, but they are called "white" Arabs and Israelies have a similar complexion to the afore mentioned ethnics, why wouldn't they be called "white" ?
Maybe you mean "lily white"? The only persons I know that fit that mold are Albinos...
As far as why Jesus is painted as "white" is most likely due to the fact that we tend to make "God" in our own image. That is we identify with a "God" that resembles us. It is a comfort thing I suppose.
my thoughts
v/r
Q