I did this. I'm nearer agnostic so I don't really understand the results.
1. Unitarian Universalism (100%)
Browse Unitarian Universalism related books. Click here for info
2. Theravada Buddhism (94%)
Browse Theravada Buddhism related books. Click here for info
3. Secular Humanism...
Why believe anything? We trust our sources of information and relate them against our experiences. If they tally we can accept that information unless refuted elsewhere. So I guess the belief issue is one of using sources against experience. What that experience is I don't know.
If the oral tradition is the stronger then why would the literary form be required? It is easier to destroy books than ideas transmitted orally. It may have been the preferred method of choice precisely because it was more durable. Literaacy may not have been great either so the demand for...
Expect a future where people can engineer their own pathogens. I don't say that lightly. I also don't mean to say that SARS is made that way, just to expect worse to come on the disease front.
I think you people are all so lucky. I live in what I can only call a metropolis. Don't you think it ironic how we isolate ourselves from nature only to try and seek it again?
Try this
http://www.comparative-religion.com/alternative/neo-paganism/myths_and_legends_of_the_celtic_race/
and
this
http://www.comparative-religion.com/alternative/neo-paganism/mabinogion/
There is nothing wrong with unprovable assumptions or assumptions that don't make sense. If we didn;t have those things we wouldn't have science. To claim to have objective knowledge would be quite a little more dangerous.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.