Search results

No no. Your view is great. Both approaches are good approaches. Hmm. Hinayana is minimalistic you say. Yes, I understand what you say. Because you take a naturalistic approach, you have shed all the so called "theological" or "religious" aspects out of it and Theravada is more minimalistic...

I didn't tell you you did. You asked me what it was, and I told you. So at least you learned something although you ignored the fact that you cannot provide the scholar, the author, the narrator and the manuscript of the 11th to 12th century hadith writing after changing it twice by two whole...

I know it's not easy to provide. In fact, it's impossible to provide. It's impossible to provide what does not exist. Ignoring that fact, cutting and pasting something that did not exist in the time period you are talking about is just an escape. That's how anti islamic polemicists operate...

I know you got it wrong brother. that's no problem. Now out of the Sitta, can you provide the scholar, narrator and manuscript dated 1100 to 1200 years ago? Thakleedh is to follow without question or using reason to refute. It's not really blind faith, but outsiders may say it's blind faith...

That's actually interesting. For what do you use your sanskrit knowledge? I mean to get your meaning from what? What sources do you use for your "Buddhist mind". This is an outside question only if you time, please give me a gist of what you mean. Thank you very much in advance.

Okay. Can you please give me the manuscript from that time? Who is the scholar, who is the narrator, what is the manuscript? Thanks. Muwatta is not only what malik wrote. Please do a bit of research prior to making such statements. Exactly. Totally agreed. Lol. Okay. I am not very well...

Which scholar? Maybe you would, but don't project it onto others. Genetic fallacy. You are wrong because it's you, but others are correct because they are them. Fallacy after fallacy mate. ;) Anyway, I would like to know the scholar who collected ahadith 1300 years ago out of Malik...

Wow what a thread.

But your knowledge of Hindi and Marathi etc etc is good enough for you to relate very well. So you will be able to understand the personality of the language very well. Even the Swara, the vayu, the Ooshna, everything will be relatable to you. Only thing is, Pali is a little different , but...

That's a different Sama Aup. It's Saa and ma pronounced as an aghosha. Peace. Tranquility. And yes, equitably settling something. In the pali text its sandhi sarasandhi. Sarothyasaming osapilesiko kaasasthatham. The Sandhi is with Samma which also has "complete, or total" meaning in it. If its...

That's a little different to saying genuine or authentic, but yes you could deem it that way. Because even the word Sahih is can be translated Authentic. But that's based on chain according to some schools, while others take both the mathn and the chain both, also while some other schools would...

That's absolutely correct. Vera is equivalent to vaira.

Which one in particular are you talking about?

Yeah. But we were talking about the sanskrit because that's what Aup spoke about. Thus, this is all irrelevant. Hope you understand.

Varenyam is not used in verse in concern, neither is an equal word. Varenyam is not the equal word in Sanskrit for Veren. If someone is using that to replace veren in the Pali Text, they are making a huge mistake as it does not make sense. Varenyam would mean accepted to enter or valuable enough...

Exactly what I meant. ;) Great.

I don't know if there is any relationship between cross languages when it comes to this word Sarai. Could be. I am not educated on that. All kinds of languages have relationships in languages so I can't say this way or that way. What I can say is that in Arabic it's Sheen, not Sadh. Sheen, Ra...

I explained in the post itself. If it's not relevant I apologise. You can ignore that.

What language is that?

I don't know in what world a hadith is Sarih because it says "I heard the prophet say". I have never heard anything worse than that. Munkar, Daif, mathrook, all kinds of hadith start with "i heard the prophet say". Does that authenticate all of them? I mean all the single narrations, and even...