Search results

If you are looking at only the meaning of the word, it means "path to water". This clear, well trodden, and all other stuff people add are conceptual. People love to add things. :)

The honour is mine brother. Cheers.

All of them are not Sarih. Every single one of them. Yes. Most likely. I can give you reasons, narrations, conflicts, scholarship, and many reasons you should consider. I already have. Just that you didn't follow through by researching about what I said. What you just did is say "I doubt...

Sorry if there are mistakes in my English writing up there because sometimes writing in a hurry makes me do typos and miss one word or two in a sentence.

Sometimes it's easier to just say "no" and escape a futile discussion when someone does not have the disposition to learn something but just make statements based on conjecture after conjecture. I have told you many times to just ask the question rather than making conjecture. That's the reason...

But you made such absurd statements. Forget advanced or mediocre. It's nonsensical. So cannot engage with that Cino. I apologise. It's impossible. Nope. No it's not.

Well. Maybe he died. ;) We. I spelled it out. We in Islam. ;) And you told me that I am having dementia? Haha. Just kidding just kidding. Nah. It won't happen. It proves, that it could have developed much later. It's not in the Qur'an, it's not in the most authentic ahadith or the Golden...

What in the world are you talking about Cino? :) I am not going to debate you on the matter of grammar in this and you making such statements about a word ending that's pretty much out of this world. I apologise for that. But you are right. It is an "unaspirated" ;)

Of course. Because you don't understand anything about the language nor do you have the humility to do so. Oh yes you have completely. Imam Malik is from the school of Medina. It's called the school of Medina. It is the oldest school of thought in Islam. Their traditions are direct Salaf...

But that would turn it into "Al", not "Ala". So it's really bad. No, but thanks. THat's not what I was referring to. You should study the script, then you will understand better. It's actually pretty easy. The thing is, you should engage with it as much as you can only to understand the...

I explained in the post. Read it and you will get the answer. That's called Israeliath in Islamic scholarship so there were many scholars who said that the belief of Jesus's return is Israeliath, which means it's an insertion based on existing influence, not Islamic. Haha. Even in the Bible...

Ah. I omitted the one's you cut and pasted because they are a completely alien type of usage though the root is the same. It's a different Faala as one would call it in arabic. So they are "IRRELEVANT". That's good. But I have given you many scholars. Islamic scholars. Earliest Islamic...

It's as I said, a conjunction of two letters. Ka and Dha. Okay. So what happens when you join Antha to both words from both languages? Brother. Do you see that you are using English transliteration which is a cut and paste. Because it's a cut and paste from somewhere it has that elongation...

It's like this RJM. I understand that linguistics might be a little too much for the discussion but the word used there have been translated by some as "will take you" in the verse 3:55, while the same word in verses 16:32, 13:40, 12:101, 10:104, 10:46, 8:50, 7L126, 7:37, etc, etc, etc are all...

Nah. I have said this many many many times. I guess you must have missed them. But that's the call for authority fallacy. "Because they say so". I have given you direct evidence from the same book, the Qur'an, from the same website that you keep referring to, giving you all the verse the same...

Shariah is not one. It's just like "law" or "legislation". It's as generic as just saying "regulation" which will change based on where you are. It's just a generic word. People who talk about it are just randomly using it for whatever reason they have. The actual law or jurisprudence is called...

Thanks for all the ad hominem. But it seems like you have missed the post. for the 100'th time. Let me cut and paste again and you can go on your ad hominem afterwards if it satisfies you. ;) Try to read the whole Qur'an, not one selected verse alone. Okay? Quran says that Jesus was taken to...

Which word are you speaking about Cino?

I replied several times. If you feel something, maybe that's projection. I can't help with that. You wish me to cut and paste my reply again? Okay. no problem. ;) I already explained this verse. ;) At least twice or maybe even many more times. :) Ma Salaboohoo, wa ma kathaloohoo. And it was...

In both languages, it's a conjunction of two words. It's that obvious. How in the world can someone "support" it when you cannot read the script brother. Maybe like you tell me to, you should take my word for it. ;) I explained this extensively. If you go back to that post you will get it...