Search results

Gurdjieff is not WLHP, esoteric, but not WLHP Try the meditation I gave you for a couple of months, you'll see Non-Theism does not validate the WLHP the Path Work validates it, we are not replacing God with Self The term GodSelf is misleading, there is no external god, there is no dogma...

I'm pretty sure you don't know what a Neurotheologist is.

There wouldn't be any other radio stations to tune into . . . other than DJ G0D G0D is there for those whose Minds are Closed

Were you able to order a copy in the UK?

Have you set yourself on the WLHP? That is the only way to know. The Western Left Hand Path is an antinomian process of externalizing your True Full Potential Self. The Arts provide the simplest and most direct way to experience this Self. The Arts enable us to Create, we experience creation...

NDE are a product of neurological shut downs when the brain is dying . . . nothing more Your mind, whether you believe it to be rational and logical, is not proof Exist in a dream world? Exist in what way? You know this . . . how? Shown by whom? Why only a couple of people? If there is a god...

. . . and your proof is . . . ?

Those are a lot of questions that require lengthy answers . . . I'll give you the succinct versions Yes The Western LHP is a valid, demonstrable actuality because there is no theistic 'faith' involved Again, The Western LHP is a valid, demonstrable actuality because there is no theistic...

For argument's sake, I use the term Left Hand Path, but what I am really referring to is the Western Left Hand Path . . . just to be clear.

What has your 'god' created exactly?

When I use the word 'faith' I mean it in the way that I have faith the sun will rise tomorrow morning, as it has for a long time, I also have faith that the tenets of the Western Left Hand Path work as they are demonstrable and consistent. The LHP is a philosophy that doesn't require objective...

Might be easier to address specific topics than reply to a whole post . . . I have trouble setting up my replies in order of the question . . .

Because history shows that he did . . . why would you say: "For sure, he had that background" and then ask me "What makes you think he may have suffered from epilepsy?" ?

"Faith is belief in the absence of evidence" Carl Sagan

It helps if you address the person you are replying to. The meme is talking about any god, because none of them have ever materialized to explain they are the Truth, or that they are a god, or anything for that matter. No one created the Universe No one created everything in the Universe Why...

You do know what 'faith' means, right? I am using the word: strong belief in God or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof. You are using the word: complete trust or confidence in someone or something. Two different things . . . Of course it's logical...

I don't find anything special about these so-called 'messengers' either . . . if there was a real god and as almighty as portrayed in scriptures, then every single individual would know without a shadow of doubt of this god's existence. This god can create the Universe but this same god cannot...

I find nothing rational or logical about theistic faith. The idea that one can reason God into existence is a failed project.

The Left Hand Path is a philosophy not a theistic faith