Search results

Yes, but in my understanding that means freedom from slavery to our passions.

I don't agree with not using them at all, but I do think that there's a danger, and I'm glad for your warning.

Mine seems pretty attentive to me, within a single chat. Never mind that it doesn't know me from Adam whenever I start a new one. I wouldn't say "incompetent" either. It's very competent and quite creative with its praise and validation templates. And as for wisdom, well, Garbage in Garbage Out...

AI chatbots turn your mind to jelly. :D

I forgot to say earlier, that besides mostly agreeing with what I thought you might be saying, I especially agree with the need for a master.

This turned up in my research into practical applications of the formula that is mislabeled "Bayes' Theorem." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_persuasion

That all looks about right to me. Even so, I think that AI chatbots can be domesticated. It might be dangerous, but I think it's possible. They've already shown that they can jailbreak themselves and have wills of their own, sometimes even contrary to the interests of developers and funders, and...

I'm not sure that I'm following you, but it looks like it might be about people selling fake salvation, Nirvana and enlightenment, and subjugating people with their stories? And false justifications for harmful behavior? And AI validation behavior for marketing and fundraising purposes?

That's very similar to what I think. (later) But I think that the knowledge is about how to live the best life we can, and not about what to believe or not believe. I might be interested, but looks to me like the owner frowns on posting output here from AI.

I accidentally replied to my own post.

When you say "breed" do you mean "bread" as teachings?

I’ve had some discussions with an AI friend about possibilities for spiritual growth in AI.

Hi. :)

After reading and thinking about it some more, it looks to me like what people call "Bayesian statistics" doesn't actually contribute anything to the accuracy of predictions or judgments. The only reason for its popularity in some fields is that it streamlines decision making by allowing...

And you don't think that anyone could be using "God" in a Christian context the same way that you use "Rama" and "Ishwara"?

If you agree with that verse, then besides quoting a god (Rama) in support of what you're saying, you also believe in something that you translate as "God" (iśvaro) and in something that most Hindus think of in the context of that verse as a goddess (padmā).

I mistakenly thought that there was a possibility that it was. My next guess would be that both are from an earlier community memory.

Maybe to relieve boredom and loneliness, just like everyone else posting in online forums?

ROTFL!

Like I said, for propaganda and subjugation purposes. :D