Search results

First thing it says it that he is an expert on the NT. I did have an atheist tell me that he had read the entire Bible. But then he backtracked and said he had only read the NT. I am willing to bet this guy is the same. I have known so many people who studied theology yet couldn't name 5...

So many times I have had friends say that they would never vote for someone who is a liar. But they vote for liars. Never made sense to me.

I have never met an atheist who ever read the Bible from cover to cover. I've been waiting for the moment for over 20 years. No such luck. But I agree in part. Many theists have their opinion, read the parts of the Bible that agree with their opinion, and then move on. Some are shocked to...

Most people's opinions are more important to them than scripture. This isn't a religious issue, it's a human nature issue. People will hold to their beliefs and opinions so strongly that facts don't have a chance. Most people will actually double down when faced with facts to the contrary...

It contradicts the scripture that it is supposed to represent.

Let me guess. He left us again. He did this the last time I cornered him on his hypocritical attitude towards other beliefs.

The irony for this is that I started craving wine when I was going through his empty claims. I'll have to wait a few more months to do some wine-tasting. Since my wife loves wine, and she obviously is abstaining while pregnant, I am following suit. Perhaps my inner self is craving wine? Or...

Stop calling out people for their beliefs and they won't call you out for yours. It... is... that... simple!!! Or maybe every time you post something about your "inner self" we'll just let you know that there isn't one iota of evidence that such a thing exists. It makes sense to you. Or you...

You basically asked this already. You haven't given one iota of evidence for any of your beliefs. I do believe that means this case is closed. You are simply someone who likes criticizing others but just hates being called out for hypocrisy. Firmly established now.

Philosophy. Not evidence. It's amazing how there is such a great divide between your definition of "evidence" when it comes to those who disagree with you and the definition you have for "evidence" when your beliefs are concerned.

And there is the deflection.

That's opinion. Not evidence. So right now God doesn't exist, or you claim this to be true. So how can you prove that life would be worse with a god? That is my point. Feel free to prove your claim. You've failed miserably so far.

I didn't say they did exist. I can't prove it with empirical evidence. But I know how you like to "debate". If you make a negative claim, then you never have to prove it. If anyone who disagrees with you makes a negative claim, they have to prove it.

It wasn't ignorance. It was assumption. I've never met a LaVeyan Satanist who I didn't like, so if you're not that makes me happy.

I must be some sort of prophet. I knew you'd say that.

The evidence that human consciousness affects these units....? So if all humans died, would the subatomic units cease to exist as well? Or will they survive as long as rats can observe them?

I stand by my post. And I'm not one to shy from criticizing the Catholic church.

You stated: "I believe just the opposite, that Consciousness forms to generate Matter. It's a trickle-down concept in that our Soul/Psyche/Self (Isolate Consciousness) exists as a singularity, which places it outside of the objective universe, and upon reflecting on itself a Duality is born...

"Quantum physicists discovered that physical atoms are made up of vortices of energy that are constantly spinning and vibrating. Matter, at its tiniest observable level, is energy, and >human consciousness is connected to it<, human consciousness can influence its behavior and even re-structure...