Search results

To be clear, the Qu'ran does say that it is the undistorted word of God and that there is other Scripture...I interpolate from there. It also says that to kill a person is to kill all people, so it actually talks against their conclusion, without other Scripture. I cannot take credit for this...

Exactly. Islamists don't see it that way. They are lost in their own misinterpretations. Of course, both are not explicitly said by the Qu'ran, only that the first is my interpretation and the second is their interpretation, so I have created the oxymoron to object to their conclusion.

It also works when the idea of each person being a universe, in its own right, or being all people is recalled (the Qu'ran says when you kill someone you kill everyone and when you save someone you save everyone). I am totally psyched that you see what I was saying and so I am not in left...

This part that confuses me about this is that there is no mention of seven gods. Furthermore, it seems that it is Genesis 1:26-27 you speak of: As an aside, this is very interesting that, like my post on the Al-Mursalat thread, God is referred to in both the singular and plural...

I totally see this now. I would add Vidya-Maya to the 2nd Logos and change the 3rd Logos: Absolute: Parabrahman (a Sanskrit word literally meaning, "beyond Brahma") 1st Logos: Purusha (Brahma) 2nd Logos: Prakriti (Vidya-Maya) 3rd Logos: Ishvara (Avidya-Maya) 7 Dhyani-Chohans So what are the...

Nick, This matches my idea of a double triangle for creation, perfectly. Imagine two triangles, one on top with a vertex up, and one underneath with a vertex down, with the bases connected. .....* ..../|\ .../.|.\ ../..|..\ ./...|...\ *_____* .\...|.../ ..\..|../ ...\.|./ ....\|/ .....*...

So, let us look at the first verse of Isha Upanishad... So, the core of Isha Upanishad that comes out from reading the other verses is that this talks of the path of knowledge, whereby one renunciates worldly aims. Later verses will talk of the path of action. This is reflected in...

I suppose no one is willing to play my game, so I will just tell you. In Al-Mursalat, the Emissaries, they are referred to in the following Ayah as "We", the plural: 77:16, 77:17, 77:18, 77:20, 77:21, 77:23, 77:25, 77:38, ... However, in Ayat 77:39, the reference is to "Me", in the singular...

Ok, so the first Logos is the splitting of the Non-Dual Absolute into matter and the other spirit. The second Logos is matter, represented by Mary or Guan Yin, through the designs of the spirit, produce the universe. So, as I see it, the Absolute is One. The 1st Logos creates Two from...

It relates to grammatical number...

Go, go Hiranyagarbha!!! :p

Here, .pdf"]Swami Nikhilananda's Volume 1 on the Vedanta Upanishads, has great commentary by Shankhya. Page 25 for a 80 page discussion on Brahman, by Swami and Page 195 for the Isa Upanishad and discussion.

The Isa Upanishad:

Here we go...Using the Qu'ran to validate and integrate the Isha Upanishad and the NT

I think the Qu'ran can be used to validate the Isha Upanishad and lend it an interpretation that would direct the Isha Upanishad to lend some understanding of the mysteries of the Bible, also validated by the Qu'ran. The Qu'ran is the cryptographic key.

I do not think Christ was born to Mary, the physical mother. Jesus/Issa was. Begotten by Mary and not begotten by God. The virgin birth as expounded upon in Surat 19: Maryam. Check 19:35...God said "Be" and it was done. Christ descended into Jesus. Christ will descend into the Lamb of...

There is some VERY INTERESTING metaphysics in the Qu'ran, but that is the answer to my question in the Al-Mursalat thread....

The lamb of the Book of Revelations.

I fail to see your point, as it is very garbled. Advaita is the strict non-dual subschool of Vedanta, the choice of Sri Ramakrishna, although Vivekananda talks of Qualiified Non-Dualism. It is a school of Hindu philosophy from the Vedas. I know some conversational arabic, phonetically...

That he is also reincarnated into the Lamb.