I am following you a little better now. To paraphrase, you are saying that there is a tradition that holds an unresolved mind/body schism. You are rejecting his and saying the functions of mind are wholly part of the animal man's brain.
Is that accurate?
If so, I am with you up to that...
Okay, here, I'll question one.
"Objects for us cannot exist independently of our conceptual schemes."
Are you saying that when you die, reality will cease to exist?
John Donohue
coberst I could go Socratic on that post and challenge each forumlation, since I disagree with many and many are dubious. But to what end?
Are you making a case FOR something?
John Donohue
Pasadena, CA
An Objectivist here, just passing by, interesting to see comments holding to the idea that it is impossible to be outside looking in. I agree. "Supernatural" is a contradiction in terms.
I also think this 'internalist perspective' as described begins to get close to proper validation of truth...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.