Please look to the other threads on this topic if you wish to argue whether he is or isn't qualified. They have much info to digest and ponder and dispute over there.
Here I have one question.
What if?
What if it is found that he is not legally/constitutionally elligible for office?
What then?
What would happen if we ousted him on that basis?
What would happen if we modified the rules for him?
No legal arguements here if he is or isn't, was or wasn't, did or didn't, should or shouldn't.
The only question I'd like to see discussed are the five questions I have listed.
It's my thread and I'll cry if I want to.
Here I have one question.
What if?
What if it is found that he is not legally/constitutionally elligible for office?
What then?
What would happen if we ousted him on that basis?
What would happen if we modified the rules for him?
No legal arguements here if he is or isn't, was or wasn't, did or didn't, should or shouldn't.
The only question I'd like to see discussed are the five questions I have listed.
It's my thread and I'll cry if I want to.