what do you make of this?

[shawn]

American Thinker: With bowed head and bended knee

The curious thing is that the media makes such a big deal about their interactions with the queen, yet this is ignored.
Bowing is not something that heads of state do.
At all.
Yet he did.
And it was not returned.
So there is a lack of respect from the Saudi potentate.
So what's up with that?

 

[wil]

American Thinker: With bowed head and bended knee

The curious thing is that the media makes such a big deal about their interactions with the queen, yet this is ignored.
Bowing is not something that heads of state do.
At all.
Yet he did.
And it was not returned.
So there is a lack of respect from the Saudi potentate.
So what's up with that?

I think he was just told his shoe was untied.

I tend to look at other articles when I read a paper, blog or website so I can judge the tenor of their reporting...recent headlines...

• The Medical Conscience Clause: Guard it with your life.
• An Apology to Israel and the Rest of America's True Friends and Allies
• The Vote that (may have) Changed the World
• Obama's Radical Foreign Policy Sacrifices Sovereignty
• New York in the Obama Years
• Farewell to Zion. Forever.
• We are all anti-Semites now
• Would You Buy an Electric Car?
• The Olympics, Chicago-style
• Those arrogant Americans

 

[Tao_Equus]

An interesting observation. Here in the UK a couple of years ago an investigation into Saudi corruption was suddenly halted after some unknown ultimatum was given by the Saudis. My belief is that the Saudis, in collusion with the Bush 'gang' planned and orchestrated the 9/11 attack. The proof the Saudis have of this is the sword that is dangled over the British and American governments.

 

[shawn]

An explosives expert has collected dust samples at the time of the event and anayzed them and found lots of thermite residue.
This should not be present.
It is found in the debris of controlled demolition explosions, as it shears off the support girders very effectively.
I saw pictures, actually video segments when they were cleaning up the site and there were lots of girders at ground level which had the same angle of shear as a demo crew would make.

 

[wil]

My belief is that the Saudis, in collusion with the Bush 'gang' planned and orchestrated the 9/11 attack. The proof the Saudis have of this is the sword that is dangled over the British and American governments.

If they had they wouldn't have used so many of their countrymen to do it. Of course the conspiracy theorists say that is proof, by using their own men then nobody would think it was them.

ah the exception that proves the rule again. tricky triple agents.

 

[Tao_Equus]

If they had they wouldn't have used so many of their countrymen to do it. Of course the conspiracy theorists say that is proof, by using their own men then nobody would think it was them.

ah the exception that proves the rule again. tricky triple agents.

lol Wil, but that is a tad naive. Just think about the early nuclear tests they did knowingly exposing your own soldiers to lethal radiation. You may call it a conspiracy theory but for me the mountains of independent evidence to support it makes it a conspiracy fact.

 

[Tao_Equus]

An explosives expert has collected dust samples at the time of the event and anayzed them and found lots of thermite residue.
This should not be present.
It is found in the debris of controlled demolition explosions, as it shears off the support girders very effectively.
I saw pictures, actually video segments when they were cleaning up the site and there were lots of girders at ground level which had the same angle of shear as a demo crew would make.

Not only that, when Thermite is manufactured it is given a chemical 'signature'. The signature of the thermite used in the 9/11 event has been traced back to a US army engineers regiment in, if memory serves me right, Maryland.

 

[shawn]

Nowadays, due to the work of the spin-doctors, any mention of the "conspiracy" word instantly conjures images of the lunatic fringe in the minds of the conditioned sheeple.

 

[Paladin]

An explosives expert has collected dust samples at the time of the event and anayzed them and found lots of thermite residue.
This should not be present.
It is found in the debris of controlled demolition explosions, as it shears off the support girders very effectively.
I saw pictures, actually video segments when they were cleaning up the site and there were lots of girders at ground level which had the same angle of shear as a demo crew would make.

Is this it?

Bentham Science Publishers

 

[wil]

Not only that, when Thermite is manufactured it is given a chemical 'signature'. The signature of the thermite used in the 9/11 event has been traced back to a US army engineers regiment in, if memory serves me right, Maryland.

So it came from Fort Dietrich...send me that info...and looking at thermite...reminds me of the reason now determined the hindenberg burned so well...aluminum paint. But now just contemplating..what are jets made of?

 

[Tao_Equus]

So it came from Fort Dietrich...send me that info...and looking at thermite...reminds me of the reason now determined the hindenberg burned so well...aluminum paint. But now just contemplating..what are jets made of?

I will try to find it for you.

No jet hit Building 7 yet it suffered an identical fate. You think too many of its users had their sandwiches wrapped in aluminium foil that day?

 

[wil]

I will try to find it for you.

No jet hit Building 7 yet it suffered an identical fate. You think too many of its users had their sandwiches wrapped in aluminium foil that day?

Namaste Tao,

And it had thermite too?

Yeah building 7 was claimed to have dominoe theory issues yeah? It was shorter and collapsed after the first two...something like soldiers marching in lockstep over a bridge? I have read all this stuff, but am more inclined to think McViegh was a patsy in the OK bombing and the first World trade center was a sting gone bad, and Pearl Harbor was quasi intentional...I can connect the dots on those...but don't yet buy 9/11...(I'm still folding our bills though) When we go into coincidences I can tell you our church held our first Ecumenical Service on 9/11/2001, after a year of planning, scheduled and advertised months before. We had I believe 9 different religions represented that year...all together preaching peace, forgiveness..less than 12 hours later...do you think they or some member of my church board was in on it?

 

[Tao_Equus]

A useful link:
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice

 

[Tao_Equus]

Namaste Tao,

And it had thermite too?

Yeah building 7 was claimed to have dominoe theory issues yeah? It was shorter and collapsed after the first two...something like soldiers marching in lockstep over a bridge? I have read all this stuff, but am more inclined to think McViegh was a patsy in the OK bombing and the first World trade center was a sting gone bad, and Pearl Harbor was quasi intentional...I can connect the dots on those...but don't yet buy 9/11...(I'm still folding our bills though) When we go into coincidences I can tell you our church held our first Ecumenical Service on 9/11/2001, after a year of planning, scheduled and advertised months before. We had I believe 9 different religions represented that year...all together preaching peace, forgiveness..less than 12 hours later...do you think they or some member of my church board was in on it?

Took me a while to believe it Wil. But there comes a time when the evidence becomes to overwhelming to ignore.

Formula for calculating distance travelled during free fall acceleration:


d = 1/2 g t (sq) where "d" is distance, "g" is Earth's gravitational acceleration and "t" is the time squared.


d = 1/2 (32) 2.25 (sq)

d = 16 (2.25) (sq)

d = 16 (5.06) = 81 feet



Quoting Dr Sunder "... a free fall time would be a time when a structure has no structural components below it..."

So, for at least 81 feet of its "collapse" there is no evidence of any structural resistance to the fall of WTC 7's roof line.

Can't happen without simultaneous and instantaneous demolition of all of its 80 or so columns.

 

[rebis]

I am pretty sure 911 was caused by Masonic lizard-men being manipulated by microwaves being rebroadcast through cell phones from space. I read it on the Internet and Alex Jones said it was true.

 

[Tao_Equus]

I am pretty sure 911 was caused by Masonic lizard-men being manipulated by microwaves being rebroadcast through cell phones from space. I read it on the Internet and Alex Jones said it was true.

What a constructive input to the question in hand!

Here are some pics of the construction of the twin towers. Check out the massive central steel structure. Steel has a melting temp. of over 3000celcius and jet fuel burns at half that temperature. On impact both jets lost most of their fuel in the 'external' fireballs and the fires we saw subsequently in the burning buildings had the signature of low temperature fires. Think about your BBQ, when you first light the charcoal it is low temperature and creates a lot of thick smoke. As its temperature increases the smoke gets thinner. What we see in the footage from 9/11 is the signature of low temperature smouldering fires. This is confirmed by 100s of witnesses who were able to flee despite being above the impact points. The construction pictures show just how robust the central steel structure was and to believe that a jet could melt it to the point where it could fall to pieces from top to bottom and land in its own footprint is far more radical a belief to hold than the obvious fact that they were controlled demolitions.

 

[17th Angel]

Everytime I see something with the queen (Rare) I just think to my self in deep sigh.... That old hags still banging on? lol I love the bit where the president dude osama meets that arab it looks like he's doing more than shaking his hand....

I couldn't be bothered to read the writing cause I watched the clips and saw just a bunch of snooty people that think they are better than everyone and an old lady who wears diamonds but stinks of piss.. *shrugs* whatever this is about it ain't worth worrying.... Ok read the title of the you tube wow... Some american woman hugs some old english woman.... Stop the press......

 

[nativeastral]

I am pretty sure 911 was caused by Masonic lizard-men being manipulated by microwaves being rebroadcast through cell phones from space. I read it on the Internet and Alex Jones said it was true.

so did david ike!

 

[shawn]

The first video on the link has the clip at 1:36.
It looks innocent enough, like so he bowed, big deal.
maybe it was just a gaff on Barack's part, but if one does any business in the east they usually study manners and protocol and such.
Then that becomes a real question.
Why did he do it?
He is a head of state so why is he bowing and scraping and kissing ass here?
Why is the arab dude so rude as to just not give even a token nod back.
You do realize how really rude that is??
like if you are sitting down and you lift up your foot and the sole of your foot is facing the direction of a mideasternguy.
Try it and see what kind of reaction you get?
Maybe get some friend you don't much like to do it for you, as he may get thumped for it. Well, maybe not as that isn't too nice.

The bits about the queen are irrelevant.
So is the rest of the so called news in the clip.
It is the overlooked, one second clip which is the issue.

Maybe the 911 issue has something to do with it as having some solid evidence would be some real heavy blackmail.

I think that the people who are in denial about that really don't want to believe that it is real as then they would have to do something more than what they are willing to do, so they waffle and say it couldn't be cause they still believe that the gov't is the friend of the people Or they just really want that to be true and so they keep their rose-colored glasses clamped on with duct-tape.

 

[Netti-Netti]

Shawn,

Why did he do it?

In the presence of royalty you're supposed to bow at least twice and then kneel. As for motive: I would speculate that Obama will be placing a follow-up phone call to "The Dude" later this week to request a postponement as far as price increases on oil. Saudi Arabia supplies the US with 1.34 million barrels of oil a day.

He is a head of state so why is he bowing and scraping and kissing ass here?

It sounds like you mean to say that a head of state should be exempt from "manners and protocol and such"? Btw, why state it as a question when you obviously want to convey a certain interpretation?

Why is the arab dude so rude as to just not give even a token nod back. You do realize how really rude that is??

Why assume "The Dude" was rude? You didn't notice that the camera did not capture "The Dude's" response? You didn't notice the abrupt cut-away? The video was clearly edited to highlight the part you like.

Btw, "the Dude" is a King. Saudi King Abdullah. Remember that. You'll need it for a crossword puzzle. Here is holding hands with GW Bush:

Looks like they're very friendly:

It is the overlooked, one second clip which is the issue.

I think you should keep trying to make it an issue. Maybe you could carry on for half a year and get a thousand posts out of it by repeating the same points with a few minor variations in the phrasing and the insinuations - kind of like some other people on this forum....