* ENLIGHTENED *.....by.....* SCIENCE *

Discussion in 'Belief and Spirituality' started by shawn, Sep 13, 2010.

  1. shawn

    shawn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    Reality is far more fantastic than anything that unaided human imagination could ever devise.
    For example: the mind could not visualize a new color, such as infrared or ultraviolet.
    It can only manipulate combinations of elements that it has already experienced.
    Everything that is truly new can only come from the Universe(or multiverse) outside.
    And uncovering the truth that is out there is of course, the function of science.

    What is knowledge?
    True knowledge, of reality as it is, as opposed to how it might appear to be or how one might wish it to be?

    What is the only system of thought that has been developed that is effective in distinguishing fact from fallacy, truth from myth, and reality from delusion?

    Science.
    All the truths we know, as opposed to beliefs which some choose blindly to adopt (as if the strength of their convictions could affect facts) have been revealed by the rational processes of applied scientific method.
    Science alone yields a basis for the formulation of beliefs whose validity can be proved because they predict results that can be tested.

    And yet,
    for thousands of years,
    the races of earth have clung persistently to their cults, their superstitions, their irrational dogmas and their impotent idols.
    They refused to accept what their eyes alone should have told them:
    That the magical and mystical forces in which they trusted and which they aspired to command......WERE FICTIONS, barren in their yield of results, powerless in prediction and devoid of any useful application.
    In a word, they were worthless, which of course, made any consequences harmless.
    And this, from a particular viewpoint, constituted a remarkably convenient situation.
    Too convenient to be merely a coincidence
    But we know that it was not merely a coincidence.
    Far from it.
    We remember.
    Those of you reading can also remember.
    Then you too will also know.



    Anamnesis.
     
  2. Dogbrain

    Dogbrain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    813
    Likes Received:
    0
    What do you know that has nothing at all to do with appearances? What do you know that does not require you to use a symbol of some form to even know you know it?

    So, in what field of science do you work, or are you just another cultist who blindly follows a made-up image of science?
     
  3. shawn

    shawn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would respond, but all you do is speak in a rude and offensive manner.
    So I will not respond to you.
     
  4. Dogbrain

    Dogbrain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    813
    Likes Received:
    0
    In other words, you are without any true working scientific background, so you're going to hide behind that.

    I've yet to collaborate with a real scientist who has such an arrogant and self-serving attitude to our work as you have. We don't worship ***SCIENCE***. We use science as a tool.
     
  5. bob x

    bob x Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,618
    Likes Received:
    1
    You need to look in a mirror before you start talking about anyone else's "arrogance".
     
  6. citizenzen

    citizenzen Custom User Title

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    3
    He is rather rude.

    Makes you wonder what he expects to contribute in a forum dedicated religious practice.

    Maybe he's hoping some wisdom and benevolence will accidentally rub off on him.
     
  7. c0de

    c0de Vassal

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well then, allow me to rephrase the issue politely.

    First of all, do you realize the scientific method was crystallized by religious minded Muslims?

    Secondly, please (notice politeness) state how the knowledge you gain through the scientific method can be considered an absolute picture of reality, when all science does is apply inexplicable symbolism to unexplained phenomenon, simply for purposes of functionalism?
     
  8. Paladin

    Paladin Purchased Bewilderment

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,084
    Likes Received:
    2
    Anamnesis, I like that. Remebering, awakening, coming back to one's senses.

    I wonder what a scientific study of religion would produce?
    A study like that would have to take in quite a bit of data before any conclusions could be drawn. Everything from the magical thinking of children to the experiences of the worlds mystics.

    Of course this would all be raw data and be open to interpretation but I would hazard a guess that we could explore religion not only as a sociological phenomena but by delving into the mythos, ethos, pathos and logos find something quite remarkable.

    All for the betterment of science of course.
     
  9. China Cat Sunflower

    China Cat Sunflower Nimrod

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,924
    Likes Received:
    10
    OK, but here's the thing: Language essentially arises from the naming of accidental gods. Science arose from the superstitious flogging about of early humans as they tried to understand and name things and processes beyond their ability to comprehend. Science and philosophy could not have developed without intermediate metaphysical modeling. So let's not kid ourselves that science is self born as a rational persuit.

    Chris
     
  10. juantoo3

    juantoo3 ....whys guy.... ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,172
    Likes Received:
    445
    Yep.

    Science at its core stems from the same foundations as religion.
     
  11. China Cat Sunflower

    China Cat Sunflower Nimrod

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,924
    Likes Received:
    10
    Yes, and culture, even secular culture, still functions as an essentially religious endeavor in the way it creates and uses mythos. Science may observe, categorize, and enumerate these functions, but it is not itself the impetus or sustenance of such.

    Chris
     
  12. shawn

    shawn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    With science we can build things that work.
    With religion we can divide and destroy, we can segregate, we can discriminate, etc.
    Religion is based on unprovable theories which people MUST take on faith to be accepted.
    Science is based on provable, reproducible facts.
    There is theoretical science which is the unproven side where we form our hypothesis, which with experimentation and effort, notions on that side can be moved into the realm of factual data which gives us "substance" to work with.
    All religion has is subjective ideas which must be taken on faith and some religions get very violent in their demands on the adherents, physically, psychologically, socially.

    In our present time, however, we also see that some people like to glorify "science" beyond what is rational.
    That is not science, that is just another type of cult.
    Our world is full of that type of crap.

    The point I am making here (one of them), is that we need to become less superstitious if we are to build a better world/society/civilization.
    Science provides a workable model which will aid that effort.
    (in spite of the faults which it also has).
     
  13. c0de

    c0de Vassal

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, it isn't, because that is an oxymoron. Anything which is unprovable is not a "theory"

    Let's examine one such "fact" shall we? >> Shawn in held down in his chair due to gravity.

    Now, science can tell us that something known as "gravity" exerts x amount of "force" on x amount of "mass". But this means absolutely nothing in terms of understanding the nature of reality. Because it can not tell us what "force" and "mass" (and "gravity") actually are. In fact, we don't even know what "x" actually is (or is it, at all?)

    So in the words of Hume, (someone who was a fierce opponent of the type of "knowledge" you think exists) just because the sun arose in the East today, does not "prove" it will again tomorrow. Because every observable/measurable phenomenon (or "fact") is no different, essentially, from magic.
     
  14. bananabrain

    bananabrain awkward squadnik

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,749
    Likes Received:
    4
    religions have been used to buld things that work, called "societies", some of which even functioned quite well. they have also been used to build innumerable cultural artifacts, books, art, music, legal systems etc. all of these "things" "worked". your terms are not terribly clear.

    well, yes, we can also write love poetry and defend the humanity of people who might not have a strictly utilitarian value. this is all a bit "glass half empty", don't you think?

    all systems of thought have an axiomatic basis. an axiom is, by definition, irreducibly faith-based. one of your axioms, for example, would presumably be that anything whose material existence cannot be tested under laboratory conditions must a priori be excluded from consideration. it's the "must" that makes it an axiom.

    what about philosophy? i think you'd get a pretty sharp answer from philosophers.

    any system of thought is subjective if it depends on axioms. so is yours. and you don't need to tell me that religion can, y'know, do bad stuff. we know about that. part of the reason we know the difference between "good" and "bad" is because of religion. then again "good" and "bad" are also "subjective ideas which must be taken on faith", philosophically speaking.

    you do seem terribly angry about this.

    b'shalom

    bananabrain
     
  15. shawn

    shawn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, split hairs then, call them ideas or notions if you will.

    I can prove gravity exists even if the exact mechanics are still beyond my grasp to explain and it seems to be consistent and reproducible the world over.
    The same goes for light which is another concept which still stumps the physicists, but the same applies. It has constants and is reproducible.

    Where is the alleged angel who delivered said scripture to Mr M.?
    They are not constant, nor reproducible, nor are any of the tenets which said scriptures go on about.
    Ahh, but the pundits and the apologists say...it is a test of our faith....the great one is testing us to see how loyal we are.
    BS.

    The point is that no one can prove that a particular god of any kind actually delivered said scriptures into the alleged hands stated.
    There is no proof of heaven or hell, being specious conjecture designed to scare people into accepting various moral codes as fundamental tenets.
    As such, we are dealing with fictional stories being used to socially manipulate gullible and ignorant people in ways that favor/benefit a small cadre of aristocrats.
    This is FRAUD.
    It is a criminal matter.
    And so it ought to be taken seriously.
     
  16. shawn

    shawn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    I will respond to each point within the quote in red:
     
  17. shawn

    shawn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    I will respond to this however.
    I am not hiding at all.
    If you wish to have an intelligent and civil discussion then you must behave and control your inner dog which has a tendency to get carried away which has made you none too popular on this board.

    I am not suggesting in any way that people ought to "worship" science as you put it.
    Science is a tool which can be used for our enlightenment and our collective betterment,and it can be quite effective in that purpose, if we apply it correctly.
     
  18. shawn

    shawn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Doubt is not a pleasant condition but certainty is absurd" - Voltaire

    So, we need to remain open minded.

    Really, these matter wouldn't be any contention at all if it were not for the ignorance of humanity.
    I hope we can do something about that issue.
     
  19. c0de

    c0de Vassal

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Neither is time, space, or matter.

    Listen Shawn, did you wonder why others on this forum, who
    have much more understanding of science then you are not
    supporting your point of view? Why do you think that is?
     
  20. shawn

    shawn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are just being defensive is all.
    Because you subscribe to one of these superstitious and unprovable ideologies.
    And, it is too early to say.
    Unless there are only a dozen or less people who come here anymore.
    But this place is notorious for being slow to get anywhere in a discussion....it could take months.
     

Share This Page