BB, hopefully you can shed some light... I heard where there is currently some Tanakh debate on the age of the books... Some scholars saying 5-7th century bc....some rabbis arguing 8-11th century bc... I think it is all relating on who's books are older, hindu, zoroastrians....but to me...the question is if the scholars are now going to say the books are older (I thought it was a consensus that the oral traditions lasted centuries if not millenia prior to writing down... But anyway what significance will the calendar have? What will year Zero signify if judaic theologians comverge on date older than the calendar?