Aussie at this point I don't remember what the circumstances were at the time I made that post that I thought your input in particular would be interesting. Looking at it now, I think my thoughts were running along the line that you would disagree with the man as to his using scripture to make the particular points he was making. I was interested in an opposing point of view. You asked for a summary and I didn't have a clue how to come up with that effectively; fortunately Phyllis did a great job of coming up with one. Still it is unfortunate you cannot see it for yourself. It is like a fire and brimstone style preacher speaking, only he is arguing for inclusiveness of everyone, no matter their lifestyle choices. Quite the opposite message one would expect.