Notes on a New Testament Cosmology

Thomas

So it goes ...
Veteran Member
Messages
15,766
Reaction score
5,095
Points
108
Location
London UK
I make no apology for cutting and pasting on this thread – simply that the authors I quote work directly from the texts, whereas I do not have any Koine Greek, nor anything like their breadth of education in the classics and the topics they discuss. These notes are, unless otherwise indicated, drawn from two substacks I subscribe to: D.B. Hart's "Leave in the Wind" and David Armstrong's "A Perennial Digression".

+++

This from Hart's Preface to the Second Edition of his translation of The New Testament

"I will only add that, in revisiting this translation, I soon discovered that I was once again experiencing many of the same things that had made writing the first version so strangely disturbing for me. Once more, I found myself in a positively uncanny world in some ways, conceptually quite unlike our own, in which – contrary to certain theological and cultural developments of later centuries – the partition between the natural and the supernatural, like that between the physical and the spiritual, simply did not yet exist.

It was a world in which numinous intelligences, in the form of stars, were visible to the eye in the sky at night, in which the heavens above were occupied by spiritual potentates of questionable character, in which angels ruled the nations of the earth as local gods, in which demons prowled the empty places, in which spirit and breath and wind were all one thing (at once transcendent and materially palpable), and in which the entire cosmos was for many an eternal divine order and for many others a darkened prison house soon to be destroyed and replaced by a redeemed creation.

And above it all, literally seated on high in an empyrean beyond the turning heavens, was God in his true dwelling place, in light inaccessible, from whom humanity was separated by a gulf at once spatial and spiritual. In that world, the highest divine reality was always near at hand – just there, above the stars, or just there at the rapidly approaching end of days – and yet also always beyond reach. And yet, as strange as that world now seems to us, what would have seemed far stranger to the people of that time was the extraordinary claim that the God who reigned on high, over this entire order of light and darkness, with all its radiant hierarchies of spirits and powers and its abysmal mysteries of demonic malice, had appeared in the form of a slave and
died as a criminal, only then to be raised up and revealed as the Lord of all things.

Whether one believes it or not, the very announcement of such a conviction in that world, in that age, was as singular an anomaly within the normal course of things, and within the ordinary frame of human history and culture, as there has ever been. I doubt any of us has ever understood it nearly as well as we imagine."

+++
 
This from Hart's extensive postscript to his translation of the New Testament – specifically 'difficult words' in Scripture.

Kosmos
"... while there are instances in the text where the word functions as an equivalent of oikoupévyn (oikoumené), the inhabited world of human beings, it more frequently means the whole of the created order, the heavens no less than the earth... (in the NT) and in Paul’s theology in particular, both slavery to death in sin and final liberation from death in divine glory are described as cosmic – not merely human – realties, taking in the whole of creation.

Moreover, the word “world” as we use it today simply does not capture what is most essential to the ancient concept ... For us, the “world” is either merely the physical reality of nature and society “out there,” or it is the human sphere with all its attendant moral and historical contingencies.

For the late antique cultures from which the New Testament came, the “cosmos” was quite literally a magnificently and terribly elaborate order of reality that comprehended nature (understood as a rational integrity organized by metaphysical principles), the essential principles of the natural and animal human condition (flesh and soul, for instance, with all their miseries), the spiritual world (including the hierarchies of the “divine,” the angelic, and the daemonic), the astral and planetary heavens (understood as a changeless realm at once physical and spiritual), as well as social, political, and religious structures of authority and power (including the governments of human beings, angels, celestial “daemons,” gods, terrestrial demons, and whatever other mysterious forces might be hiding behind nature's visible forms).

It is a vision of the whole of things that is utterly unlike any with which most of us are today familiar, and that simply does not correspond to any meaning of “world” intuitively obvious to us."

+++
 
in which angels ruled the nations of the earth as local gods,
This concept isn't mentioned very often.
I remember my grandfather talking about this, running across it in some of the reading material he had, and running across it in other sources over the years but never with much explanation. The ideas helped form my theory that the various world religions were legit and based in the same fundamental reality as what Christian neighbors self-reported holding a belief in, and not somehow "false" as some members of the Christian family would sometimes attest.
 
Moreover, the word “world” as we use it today simply does not capture what is most essential to the ancient concept ... For us, the “world” is either merely the physical reality of nature and society “out there,” or it is the human sphere with all its attendant moral and historical contingencies.
It is a vision of the whole of things that is utterly unlike any with which most of us are today familiar, and that simply does not correspond to any meaning of “world” intuitively obvious to us."
I often wonder what is actually meant / what it actually encompasses when people refer to "the world" in the context of contrast to Christiany - I know the phrase and the contrast has an origin in scripture, but I have often wondered what is meant by "the world" - even in modern secular jargon we could mean the physical reality of nature, probably limited to the physical spherical planet but possibly not? and it could also mean the human society but which one? Cultures are different. For that matter even specific fields of endeavor (professions, sports, arts, specific corners of society) are said to have their own "worlds"
 
Back
Top