Well Francis the reason I object to it is that I see its potential as the thin end of a very long wedge. Part of a totalatarian control where all dissent will be neutralised and the masses reduced to compliance in order to live within society. I believe it is the masses who should decide the governence of society and not a few faceless corporate heads. Right now we still have the semblence of some degree of personal freedom of thought, action, employment etc. Tho much of it is illusionary. But how long will it be before all this collected information will be used to freeze out the free thinking, those that question, those that have certain genetic traits ?
Investigative police departments of course should have the remit to use whatever they can to identify and aprehend criminals. But this should require a court order when it comes down to a suspected 'individual'. The recognition software used by the search engines is of enormous value to investigative policing and I hope they do use it whenever they can. But personal information should not become the property of unnacountable companies for whatever reason. I dont want to be targeted for direct marketing, I dont want my family history of illness to bear upon my insurance quotes, or my political thought deny me a job in the local council department. This is what its about. Should the people decide who has control over society... or corporations.?
Dang, never thought I would do this in a million years, but Dapz to 17th angel.
You are right about errthing. oops the ghetto came out. Back in the box you go.
Why do you people seem so shocked when I am right..... Oh well I think that is the 4th 5th time this week someone has said I am right... You're all coming around mwahaha.... Come to my side
Not sure what dapz means, but I'll take it.