That’s philosophy for ya!

coberst

Well-Known Member
Messages
427
Reaction score
0
Points
0
That’s philosophy for ya!

At birth an infant has a minimal innate arithmetic ability. This ability to add and subtract small numbers is called subitizing. (I am speaking of a cardinal number—a number that specifies how many objects there are in a collection, don’t confuse this with numeral—a symbol). Many animals display this subitizing ability.

At birth an infant and many other creatures have the ability to reason in a minimal way. To reason is to infer and to infer requires that a neurological structuring conducive to inferring is necessary. Thus to reason is to conceptualize and to infer. Conceptualizing is the creation of neural structures that make inferring possible.

To infer is to make very simple ‘if then’ decisions. Two ‘if then’ examples are ‘if A is true and B is true than C is true’ and ‘if A or B is true then C is true’. You can think of these as ‘and’ gates and ‘or’ gates. These two very simple inferences make it possible for us to do the reasoning that we do. If you examined your computer you would discover that these two simple inference ‘gates’ makes up your computer. All of the complex things that your computer can do results from these two simple elemental inference terms.

An infant can do math and an infant can reason. Of course, we all know that our ability to do math can go far beyond this simple innate ability. Likewise, our ability to reason can go far beyond this simple innate ability.

The philosophy department in college offers a course called Logic 101. Logic means principles. Logic 101 teaches the principles of reasoning. Every person should know the knowledge contained in Logic 101 but since few people were taught this they need to learn this on their own. If our schools did not teach arithmetic all citizens would be well advised to get a book on arithmetic and learn it on their own. Such is true also about reasoning; Logic 101 is the principles of reasoning. Just like math reasoning has vast complexities and possibilities for helping us live our lives

Who is the judge? I am the judge for me and you are the judge for you. One cannot hide from this truth and it is a no brainier that each of us is well advised to become as proficient in this matter as possible.

The Catch-22 is that the person who has little learning regarding this matter is the person most in need of self-study of this subject. In other words, the person with the least ability in making good judgments is the person who will make the judgment as to whether to spend the effort and time in acquiring the knowledge required to make good judgments.

Each of us makes many judgments every day. Each judgment made has some affect on our life. There are bad judgments, good judgments, and better judgments. The more ‘better judgments’ we make in our life the better our life will be, generally speaking.


Physics is about knowledge and is about objects in our world. Philosophy is about understanding and is about meaning that we impose upon the world of objects.

Understanding is a confluence of emotion and reason and happens rarely. It is a long step beyond knowing and is a synthesis of knowledge. When we do philosophy it is like the jazz player who integrates knowledge with emotion and plays the meaning that he or she understands. This understanding is not necessarily related to truth except that it is a synthesis of knowledge.

Physics is about knowledge concerning objects that can be measured. Knowledge is about truth, i.e. about how reality is. Philosophy is about meaning; it is an attempt to understand the world as an object of meaning; it goes beyond that which can be measured. Philosophy does not deal only with factual knowledge. Philosophy creates meaning which has no truth value in the sense that physics does. Philosophy is not merely a word game but neither is it a natural science that attempts to speak to the nature of reality.

Philosophy is a jazz solo. When we study philosophy we learn what the greatest minds have to say about these matters and from this knowledge we can get an idea of how we can do likewise.

CT (Critical Thinking) is philosophy lite. This is what philosophy means to me.

What does philosophy mean to you?
 
I have a deep affection for philosophy and consider critical thinking to be scant in society. The problem (if it really is one) is that to expect the same intellectual curiosity in others is unrealistic.
Considering the varied personality types-e.g. MBTI- emotional intelligence, IQ and other indicators of development in the populace, looking to spread the good news of logic may well be impossible.
Our media predicates its entire existence on a lack of reason. Marketing rarely appeals to our sense of logic ( ocean breeze soap gets you clean! I'm looking at you Dream) rather they appeal to our emotion, unhealthy sense of self and greed.
Politics does the same ( I'm looking at you Fox News!)

Regardless of all this though, it is well that there are those who can light a candle rather than curse the darkness. Thanks Coberst!
 
Paladin

I am convinced that CT can and should be taught to high schoolers. Of course, we must also do the fundamentals much better than we now do.
 
My wife has worked in education for thirty years, and she tells me of the difficulty she runs into with this. Apparently the school system attempts to integrate CT rather than having a separate course of study.
I like the idea of having a course of study as you suggest.
 
Hi there coberst

You ask what philosophy means to me and suggest that

Philosophy creates meaning which has no truth value in the sense that physics does.

Philosophy for me is the study of wisdom. Do we create wisdom or do we strive for the objective experience or wisdom? I believe it is objective reality since it reflects the reality of the interactions of universal laws.

IMO we create certain levels of meaning but do not create the source of meaning or wisdom. In Christianity wisdom existed long before man

Every great spiritual teaching speaks of itself in its own way as a mirror of cosmic reality. In the traditions of China the Tao is both the way to truth and the way things are. In Christianity the Word is both the teaching of Jesus Christ and the fundamental manifestation of God. In the Hindu tradition (including Buddhism) Dharma means both duty and the sustaining order of the universe. And in the Hebrew tradition Torah includes not only law in the sense of the teaching, but also law in the sense of the foundations of God's creation. A well-known passage in the book of Proverbs expresses this idea without ambiguity. Wisdom is speaking:
(Proverbs 8:22-33)
The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.
I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water...
When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth... when he gave the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment; when he appointed the foundations of the earth: then I was by him...
Now therefore harken unto me, O ye children: for blessed are they that keep my ways.
Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.​
Buddhism and Hinduism also has this definition of Dharma​
1. Hinduism & Buddhism
a. The principle or law that orders the universe.
b. Individual conduct in conformity with this principle.
c. The essential function or nature of a thing.
Wisdom is the psychological understanding of universal laws as they relate to our "being."

We create meaning for ourselves and society does it for us that attaches us to the earth. Wisdom is one tool leading to freedom from this slavery to attachment. Philosophhy was once thought of in this way but now, having lost its "heart," is usually just a type of snobbish intellectual gymnastics
 
My wife has worked in education for thirty years, and she tells me of the difficulty she runs into with this. Apparently the school system attempts to integrate CT rather than having a separate course of study.
I like the idea of having a course of study as you suggest.

I think that those who wish to only integrate CT do not understand CT.
 
Nick

Long ago I asked a professor of philosophy “what is philosophy about?” He said that philosophy is about radically critical self-consciousness. It was 30 years later that I finally understood his meaning and was able to agree with it.
 
Nick

Long ago I asked a professor of philosophy “what is philosophy about?” He said that philosophy is about radically critical self-consciousness. It was 30 years later that I finally understood his meaning and was able to agree with it.

Yes this is what philosophy has become. Initially it was pursuit of the love of wisdom. I prefer the old definition before philosophy lost its "heart."
 
My definition of philosophy would be "Making the attempt to answer the really interesting questions." Perhaps it was best defined in Mel Brook’s History of the World when Comrcus applied for unemployment compensation and the attendant asked him, “What is your former line of work.” He answered, “Stand-up Philosopher.” Ahhhhhh, a bullsh*t artist! There is a certain truth to that, be it intentional or not. A scientist believes he knows. A philosopher knows he believes.
 
Back
Top