Well 'here' physically, of the first; 'here' mentally as we can conceive beyond the limits of our physical reach; and 'here' spiritually as 'here' is everywhere ...
How do you define (mental) here, as we can figure things out?
I'd define mental as in the processes of the mind ... the issue is 'figuring things' out that themselves have no limit, no 'periphery' or 'edge' because the mind is open to the limitless infinite ... I'm not sure we'll ever develop a true 'theory of everything' because too often that comes with a priori assumptions ... and when you approach the Ground of Being there is just ... being ... nothing to figure out ...
See there is a problem as universes go.
There is as long as one's confined within a universe/multiverse context ... universes are themselves a mode of being
... We will keep losing time until we become nothing here.
I'm not sure how you reckon this. Time belongs to the finite world of multiplicity.
Imagine the universe an hour glass and in the top is everything here in this universe we can see.
The 'all-possible' within the context of this universe?
The bottom of the hour glass is everything not here in the top of the hour glass (I say nothing here).
The phrase in parenthesis throws me.
I would picture an hourglass, with all-that-is-possible in the top half, trickling through – in time – to realisation in the bottom half.
This universe, being one of finitude and contingency, means what which is realised is never quite as perfect as that which is possible – in this world it's always possible to go one step more ...
The sand in the lower half of the hour glass must run completely out of time before it can become something again.
Where is that sand running to?
The problem is how can we figure ourselves out in the end of time when no time remains.
When time ends, so do 'we' as figuring-out entities ...
Billions of years from now who cares right, well that is why god got involved.
God ... the Ground of Being ... is never not-involved.
In the end of time minds remain lit up until they too start to fall into ("absolutely nothing here figure absolutely nothing out").
It seems here you are talking about a mind transcending time, which is entirely possible and actual, outside of time there is nothing to figure out.
The nature of 'personal' being is it is relational. The idea of 'relation' is intimately tied up with 'person', all persons exist in relation, to themselves and to others, one's own being is as mysterious as the being of one's neighbour. It is in relation that we discover something of ourselves, of others, of the world, and so on ...
This is why god taught nothing inside of himself his desire was to find away that no thing would ever become nothing here again.
This places contingency on God, which I think is an error.
The nature of 'being' and 'becoming' is that every universe is a becoming, an emergence from and an eventual submersion into, the Ground of Being. Not 'everything' will emerge because the Ground is Infinite, and is not a collection of things, it's pure Is-ness, and Is-ness has no number, no limit ...
... Just some thoughts back ...