Hey

Francisco Gonzalez said:
Also if you can't explain to others in words why they are wrong why even try to argue?
Click to expand...
I meant you use a LOT of words to explain things that could be said in far fewer words. So you got me wrong again, now didn't you?
Francisco Gonzalez said:
And there it is! Like clockwork. With grammatical errors as expected of you. And some of my posts aren't available to visitors so that the conversation is being manipulated.
Click to expand...
Two posts reported by members as personal attacks inappropriate for this interfaith discussion website have been held back for mod approval
 
Ella S. said:
If they're wrong he'll probably just say you're in denial. Embarrassingly, I went through a similar phase when I was like 12.
Click to expand...

Embarisingly because...your type doesn't really understand people, you're too in your own mind to really see others, so I can't imagine you being too good at it, less at 12!
 
RJM said:
Two posts reported by members as personal attacks inappropriate for this interfaith discussion website have been held back for mod approval
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, by the way. I won't bother much from now on, mostly I'll talk if spoken to and keep it to the rules, or do something else really since I'm also pretty busy now a days. Sorry for the fuss! It's never on purpose that I disrupt and it's never in mean spirits, it's just how it goes...
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJM
Francisco Gonzalez said:
I'm sorry, by the way. I won't bother much from now on, mostly I'll talk if spoken to and keep it to the rules, or do something else really since I'm also pretty busy now a days. Sorry for the fuss! It's never on purpose that I disrupt and it's never in mean spirits, it's just how it goes...
Click to expand...
Thank you for understanding
Looking forward to your continuing participation here :)
 
Francisco Gonzalez said:
Ice cold. Okay then.
Click to expand...

Probably the most accurate description of me you've made so far.

Francisco Gonzalez said:
Embarisingly because...your type doesn't really understand people, you're too in your own mind to really see others, so I can't imagine you being too good at it, less at 12!
Click to expand...

I certainly don't really understand people, although I don't think it's so much that I'm too in my mind as it is that I have trouble relating to them. They have all of these emotions and depth that I simply lack.

It seems you don't understand people very well, either, given your off-the-mark statements and poor first impressions. Keep up the practice, though; you will get better with it over time.
 
Ella S. said:
Probably the most accurate description of me you've made so far.
Click to expand...

Well yeah, Einstein abused his wife and Holmes constantly abused the man who saved his life. Now thats ice cold!

But it's because you guys have no idea how to connect with your feelings or others', which is fine obviously as you wouldn't want it any other way. You see, that's why personality types have immutable characteristics: your personality is determined by the things you WOULDNT WANT to change. And you wouldn't want to be touchy-feeley EVER. However it's important for your type to try to find a balance. Your lack of feeling is detrimental because without them you can't really have full knowledge about your own mind, just like for my type it's important to be more logical like you guys. But I'd never want to to be your type, and you wouldn't want to be ours.

As for off the mark statements and poor first impresions, you didn't even explain what statements were off the mark or what first impression was bad, therefore is unhelpful criticism.

Anyway I've already pretty much concluded this is a waste of time since I already discovered your emotional polarities, that means you're X011 or X001 and cant handle +1 positive emotions or -1 negative ones, you can handle 0 which is contentment but never jubilation, you might even be happy in intense depressions at time, definitley handle negative emotions better than positive ones since the positive ones drive you into chaos. So you're regressing, but hey, at least you have clarity! Which you will use to be condescending towards me. Which won't work with me at all since my type doesn't appreciate that lack of empathy. I don't need the pat on the head or your crumbs, Countess.
 
Last edited:
Francisco Gonzalez said:
Anyway I've already pretty much concluded this is a waste of time
Click to expand...
We may agree.
Francisco Gonzalez said:
Which you will use to be condescending towards me. Which won't work with me at all since my type doesn't appreciate that lack of empathy. I don't need the pat on the head or your crumbs
Click to expand...
You do realize you said this out loud and people are able to read what you write eh?
 
Francisco Gonzalez said:
Well yeah, Einstein abused his wife and Holmes constantly abused the man who saved his life. Now thats ice cold!
Click to expand...

I think it's ironic that you imply that I'm abusive after your negging.

Francisco Gonzalez said:
But it's because you guys have no idea how to connect with your feelings or others', which is fine obviously as you wouldn't want it any other way. You see, that's why personality types have immutable characteristics: your personality is determined by the things you WOULDNT WANT to change. And you wouldn't want to be touchy-feeley EVER. However it's important for your type to try to find a balance. Your lack of feeling is detrimental because without them you can't really have full knowledge about your own mind, just like for my type it's important to be more logical like you guys. But I'd never want to to be your type, and you wouldn't want to be ours.
Click to expand...

I don't think it's important for me to find balance nor do I think I lack full knowledge of my own mind. I've also yet to see you demonstrate any amount of logic. Mostly you've been making large assumptions based on pop psychology which is most illogical.

Francisco Gonzalez said:
As for off the mark statements and poor first impresions, you didn't even explain what statements were off the mark or what first impression was bad, therefore is unhelpful criticism.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure we've already pointed out a few of those to you before.

Francisco Gonzalez said:
Anyway I've already pretty much concluded this is a waste of time since I already discovered your emotional polarities, that means you're X011 or X001 and cant handle +1 positive emotions or -1 negative ones, you can handle 0 which is contentment but never jubilation, you might even be happy in intense depressions at time, definitley handle negative emotions better than positive ones since the positive ones drive you into chaos.
Click to expand...

This is the sort of lack of logic and off-the-mark random mass guessing I'm talking about.

Francisco Gonzalez said:
So you're regressing, but hey, at least you have clarity! Which you will use to be condescending towards me. Which won't work with me at all since my type doesn't appreciate that lack of empathy. I don't need the pat on the head or your crumbs, Countess.
Click to expand...

Then why are you begging me for them in a pathetic attempt at reverse psychology? As for "regression," I think you're the last person I'd trust the opinion of on what counts as "regressing."
 
Ella S. said:
Then why are you begging me for them in a pathetic attempt at reverse psychology? As for "regression," I think you're the last person I'd trust the opinion of on what counts as "regressing."
Click to expand...

You think connecting with people is a form of begging. Connection over.
 
wil said:
So you are intentionally inciting the members, readers and management to flag your posts and give you the boot?

Is that what your type does?
Click to expand...

Yes, the boot, you use that word because yours is the type that marches in line after all. You dont get to decide what all the readers like, I'm sure some agree with me, and if not, give them the chance.
 
Francisco Gonzalez said:
You think connecting with people is a form of begging. Connection over.
Click to expand...

If this is how you connect with people, I recommend that you take a social skills class. I don't mean that as an insult, I just think you're going about it all wrong. I don't think I'm the problem here.
 
wil said:
This would be the place for all who have read this far to say how much you like the style and tenor of Francisco's thread and his comments.
Click to expand...

It's never a good sign for discussion when somebody makes a habit of telling others what they think and feel. It's highly unlikely to lead to anything productive, in my opinion.
 
wil said:
This would be the place for all who have read this far to say how much you like the style and tenor of Francisco's thread and his comments.
Click to expand...

Signing into a forum there's a mutual agreement with the admin and site that the posts can't be deleted, or should not, so as to not destroy the whole interactions (which is done anyway by deletion of posts through trumped up charges) so that you have to consider readers who stumble upon this thread in three, six, or nine years, but you don't cause your type are presentists who don't think of the future.
 
Francisco Gonzalez said:
Signing into a forum there's a mutual agreement with the admin and site that the posts can't be deleted
Click to expand...

No, there isn't. Deleting posts is common practice on the vast majority of forums. The only forums I've been to that don't delete posts were chan boards. This isn't a chan board.

Francisco Gonzalez said:
or should not, so as to not destroy the whole interactions (which is done anyway by deletion of posts through trumped up charges) so that you have to consider readers who stumble upon this thread in three, six, or nine years,
Click to expand...

As a hobbyist archivist that has already saved several threads on this site and will probably back up the apocrypha when I have time, part of the archival process is making the hard choice of what to spend your resources saving. It's not a nice part of the process but it is a necessary one. I do think, ideally, nothing would ever be fully lost.

Francisco Gonzalez said:
but you don't cause your type are presentists who don't think of the future.
Click to expand...

Tell you what, I went ahead and archived this whole thread on the Wayback machine so the people of the future can bask in your glorious, misunderstood intellect without having to trust the mods not to remove the wisdom of your superior mind:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220427215817/https://www.interfaith.org/community/threads/20131/
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJM
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top