Thoughts about Trinity beliefs

..perhaps you can tell me why I should want to live forever? .. if I have a choice, that is.
no idea.
if immortality is conditional, you wouldn't.
..conditional upon what? ..wouldn't what?
..conditional upon what? .
Upon G-d granting eternal life
..wouldn't what?
Wouldn't live forever (referencing your earlier comments)
 
CONDITIONAL IMMORTALITY







ENCLOSING THE AMAZON LINK BECAUSE THE DESCRIPTION IS SO RICH AND EXPLANATORY

ENCLOSING THE REDDIT LINK BECAUSE THE DISCUSSION IS GOOD

 
Upon G-d granting eternal life
..so I'm forced to live forever, if I believe in Jesus Christ?

What I'm trying to point out, is that the doctrine of conditional immortality assumes that
people would want to live forever.

Clearly many people do not .. the suicide rates are increasing.
Rich people often want to live forever .. I understand there are many film-stars of Hollywood
that have been frozen, hoping to be rejuvenated in a later century. ;)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

However, if a soul is immortal, there is no escape from our deeds .. good or bad.
That corresponds to present reality .. where eventually, bad deeds get caught up with.

..so philosophically, I don't see that the doctrine makes any sense .. there is only heaven
and no hell .. and we can apparently escape any consequence like Hitler, who topped himself.
 
Last edited:
..so I'm forced to live forever, if I believe in Jesus Christ?
It's not so much being forced as 'seeing the light' ;)
Clearly many people do not .. the suicide rates are increasing.
But that's mental instability, among other things – it's becoming subject to illusion, or subject to the archon of this world – death – in the view that death is the best solution all round.

Rich people often want to live forever .. I understand there are many film-stars of Hollywood
that have been frozen, hoping to be rejuvenated in a later century. ;)
Yerse ... and Jesus had something to say about that (riches, I mean).

However, if a soul is immortal, there is no escape from our deeds .. good or bad.
Quite right. There is a process of purification.

That corresponds to present reality .. where eventually, bad deeds get caught up with.
Yes and no ... our present reality still hankers after retribution. We require suffering as part of the process – we feel short-changed otherwise.

..so philosophically, I don't see that the doctrine makes any sense .. there is only heaven and no hell .. and we can apparently escape any consequence like Hitler, who topped himself.
But that's not the doctrine.

1: There is heaven and hell.
2: Hell is a temporary condition until the summation of the Age.
2a: It my well be that Heven is equally temporary, until the summation of the Age.
(In that Jesus returns, a New Jerusalem, and then the summation of the age.)
3: Hitler will not have escaped the consequences of his actions.
Therefore, we assume a lot of purification necessary, although we can also see that he was not in his right mind (being an addict, and off his rocker) and thus there are mitigating circumstances.

But whet we really face is not what God thinks is just, but what we think is just.

I think if something is so utterly corrupt that, after the purifying fire, there's actually no vestige of what once there was surviving the process, then it's non-existence.

If God is just, then perpetual punishment with no remittance, and no chance of change or repentance, is disproportionate and unjust.

Again, if no good comes out of it, I cannot see why God would will it, as God wills only the good?
 
But that's not the doctrine.
It is for the evangelicals.
Those who do not 'believe in Jesus' will cease to exist.

1: There is heaven and hell.
OK

If God is just..
We all know that G-d is Holy, perfect.

..then perpetual punishment with no remittance, and no chance of change or repentance, is disproportionate and unjust.
..but I don't see G-d as a person who sentences people to eternal punishment.
..or sentences people to eternal paradise, for that matter.

We reap what we sow .. it's all about the nature of a soul .. and the fact that it does not
disappear upon physical death.

Again, if no good comes out of it, I cannot see why God would will it, as God wills only the good?
Ummm .. G-d allows evil in this present life .. n'est pas? 😑
 
It is for the evangelicals.
Those who do not 'believe in Jesus' will cease to exist.
No, most evangelicals believe in eternal conscious torment in hell
More heterodox groups like SDAs, JWS, Christadelphians, and the descendants of the Armstrong churches, believe in conditional immortality, where the wages of sin = death.
 
..but I don't see G-d as a person who sentences people to eternal punishment.
..or sentences people to eternal paradise, for that matter.

We reap what we sow .. it's all about the nature of a soul .. and the fact that it does not
disappear upon physical death.
If you don't believe in eternal punishment, or eternal paradise, or conditional immortality, what IS your theory about what happens to a soul in the afterlife? 🤔
 
If you don't believe in eternal punishment, or eternal paradise, or conditional immortality, what IS your theory about what happens to a soul in the afterlife?
I have no theory..
..but I believe in life after physical death, and that people will not be wronged.
We will reap what we sow .. much like as in this life, with the caveat that our
deeds can no longer be hidden.
 
Only 16% of self-identified Christians in the United States believe in the Trinity, according to a 2025 study by the Cultural Research Center at Arizona Christian University.
 
It is for the evangelicals.
Those who do not 'believe in Jesus' will cease to exist.
Yeah ... OK ... I don't agree.

..but I don't see G-d as a person who sentences people to eternal punishment.
..or sentences people to eternal paradise, for that matter.
Well I don't agree with 'sentences' either, and I don't agree with eternal punishment because that's not what Scripture says.

Nor do I agree that God would set up an eschatalogical condition that was fundamentally unjust. Eternal punishment for a temporal wrong – no matter how wrong that might be – with no opportunity to learn, repent or reform – is fundamentally not 'just' – it's a very poor God who can't come up with something better than that.

We reap what we sow .. it's all about the nature of a soul .. and the fact that it does not
disappear upon physical death.
OK, but is it 'locked' in the sense that it cannot repent? That it cannot be enlightened to see the ill it has done, and worse, when enlightened to see the ill it has done, is offered no chance of repentance or remorse, but is punished anyway.

I do think we reap what we sow, I just don't think we reap it eternally, toewards no good end and for no good reason whatsoever.

Ummm .. G-d allows evil in this present life .. n'est pas? 😑
Yes ... and God allows repentance ...
 
I don't agree with eternal punishment because that's not what Scripture says.
That's debatable..

Nor do I agree that God would set up an eschatalogical condition that was fundamentally unjust..
No, of course not..

Eternal punishment for a temporal wrong – no matter how wrong that might be – with no opportunity to learn, repent or reform – is fundamentally not 'just'..
..and again, it depends on the definition of 'eternity' .. we've already covered that.

OK, but is it 'locked' in the sense that it cannot repent?
Cannot .. or will not?

That it cannot be enlightened to see the ill it has done..
Yes .. it's very sad isn't it.
..that people refuse to repent.

If a person can't repent in this life, then what makes you think that they would repent after their death?

Yes ... and God allows repentance ...
I have never claimed otherwise.
 
That's debatable..
Clearly. I know what I believe.

Let me be clear, I'm not denying 'punishment' – as you say, 'we reap what we sow', rather, what I am saying is that 'eternal' is a well-documented error of translation from Greek to Latin, and 'punishment' is only just, or valid, when it is curative, restorative, or purgative, or what have you; that is, when there is a positive and beneficial outcome as a result.

Without that, it seems vindictive to me, serving no good purpose at all.

..and again, it depends on the definition of 'eternity' .. we've already covered that.
And I've made my position clear on that point, too.

Cannot .. or will not?
Well if will not, then I do not see how that entity can survive in any meaningful form – as God holds all things in existence.

Yes .. it's very sad isn't it.
..that people refuse to repent.
Exactly.

I think, faced with the undeniable truth, then how can they not? But if they refuse to acknowledge what is indisputable, then again we're talking of an entity so corrupt that it's ceased to function as a rational creature. In which case, again, punishment would be an irrational response, because it's not going to achieve anything ...

If a person can't repent in this life, then what makes you think that they would repent after their death?
Well if they can't repent, then punishment for not repenting would be unjust.

I rather think it's because they're obdurate, they refuse to repent in this life because they deny the reason to repent. Hard to do that when you're face-to-face with it ...

I have never claimed otherwise.
Well there you go ... in thios world we can delude ourselves, in that, there is no delusion, so then we're faced with the sum of our errors, as it were.
 
Well if will not, then I do not see how that entity can survive in any meaningful form..
Well, there you go then..
A person in prison in this life continues to exist .. and they can repent of their crime (or not).
If G-d willed, they would not exist (if they refused to repent).
..but that is not reality.

I think, faced with the undeniable truth, then how can they not?
That is not borne out by reality.
People DO refuse to repent .. and I do not believe it is because they have no conscience.
They just ignore it, as their soul is corrupt.

But if they refuse to acknowledge what is indisputable, then again we're talking of an entity so corrupt that it's ceased to function as a rational creature. In which case, again, punishment would be an irrational response..
Again, you view "punishment" as if "a person called G-d" is responsible for it. (metes it out)
As G-d has given US the responsibility, then we are responsible for our own souls.


,because it's not going to achieve anything ...
I couldn't agree more.
Perhaps you can ask satan why he "cuts off his nose to spite his face". 😑

I rather think it's because they're obdurate, they refuse to repent in this life because they deny the reason to repent. Hard to do that when you're face-to-face with it ...
I see .. but imagine the following scenario..
A person refuses to repent in this life, and continually commits crimes and is repetitively imprisoned.
Upon their death, they claim to repent (to free themselves), and they join those in paradise..
What happens if that person who repented continues to commit crimes in paradise?

I find it illogical. I do NOT believe that a person who is given multiple chances to repent is going
to change. Life is serious .. and we have been warned.
WE are responsible for the consequences .. and not G-d.
G-d is Oft-Forgiving, Merciful.

..but the non-repentant sinner has cast himself out .. proved not to be trustworthy.
According to you, a soul is manufactured somehow by G-d .. easy come .. easy go.
I do NOT believe that .. I believe that the physical body expires, but NOT the soul.

Can (or will) an evil person, such as satan, repent after their death?
I have no idea .. but I take the warning seriously, and prefer to avoid finding out..
 
Back
Top