Hi Tony —
Yes it is not tolerance, is a subjective personal submission to all the past Prophets and Messengers, under new guidance from G-d.
Ooh, be careful, old friend as, tragically, that road has been well trod by those who make that claim to endorse and justify a multitude of sins and atrocities down through history. That's a sure road to those same horrors: "It's for your own good" and "This hurts me more than it hurts you" – both of which are rarely true.
Subjective personal submission is just that, it is
subjective and
personal, like prayer. It is never a reason for, nor a justification of, inflicting oneself or one's beliefs upon another.
It is the meaning of the greater
jihad (
al-jihad al-akbar), the spiritual struggle against one's own lower desires, ego, and moral failings. It is when we fail there, as history's bloody handprint shows, the lesser
jihad (
al-jihad al-asghar), invariably leads to intolerance and violence against one's neighbour.
Note:
Please read my use of Arabic terms as a reference for a principle applicable in
all religions, this is
not directed at historical Islam – simply that the Arabic seems the most succinct.
Oh, Thomas ...... I can pass on only what is already written, they are not my warnings, they are written by G-d.
The 'warnings' written by God in my religion (and in the Abrahamics generally, I think), are two-fold:
1: Love God, and repent of sin;
2: Love my neighbour, that I might be worthy of God's.
Love conquers all and everything; Love makes the world anew; Love never coerces.
We all own and need to polish the mirror that is our own self, let the one without any sin cast the first stone.
I rather think the point here is –
the one without sin does not cast stones:
"Then Jesus lifting up himself, said to her: Woman, where are they that accused thee? Hath no man condemned thee? Who said: No man, Lord. And Jesus said: Neither will I condemn thee. Go, and now sin no more."
Neither condemnation nor judgement; no force, no coercion, no intolerance ...
Shoghi Effendi summed up the exact stance that any Baha'i should embrace and if they were mature enough, to impart only to those that wish to hear.
I will put it under Spoilers, so people can choose to see what that summary is.
Perhaps wiser if you did not, Tony, but we can't put spilled milk back in the bottle.
If you choose to discuss that text and my issues and objections, then OK, but as it's your
sacra doctrina, I have no desire to cause offence and see little value in the exercise. Suffice to say that I would have thought any Abrahamic believer will observe their own questions and contradictions.
Peace to all, Regards Tony
I wish that were true.