Reasons for thinking that no notes were taken while Jesus and apostles were teaching?

[Thomas]

What I’m discussing in this thread is the imaginary scenario where the disciples of Jesus did not do what disciples of others teachers did. In asking and searching for reasons for people thinking that, what I found reduces to:
1: No one ever said that the disciples wrote notes, which is not actually true.
2. The literacy rate was low. Disciples of other teachers lived in the same society, with the same literacy rate, but they wrote notes, copied them into compilations, and recopied them as needed for their purposes.

What you're doing here is offering a weave of fiction and history.

In making sense of the Christian narrative, you are imagining a solution and imposing that on events, coming up with your own fictive history.

What you're offering is not historically accurate – nor can it be – it's a mixture of history and imagination shaped round each other – you keep making the same claim as if it is an indisputable fact, whereas it's nowhere near as certain as that, and your argument in support rests on comparing chalk and cheese – unalike scenarios.

I've repeated this over and again, and you won't address it.

You're offering an imagined fiction of text transmission as a historical fact.

I have nothing further to say on the matter.