I appreciate the humor. But what is the Way for you? thanks brianThe way... or the way according to those who follow it.
Me? I miss maps, gps doesn't cut it...the convenience misses out on the journey and focuses on the destination.
If I have a choice I paddle downstream. I have spent much of my life utilizing opm and opt not in a billionaire way but more of a Robin hood/ Tom Sawyer way.I appreciate the humor. But what is the Way for you? thanks brian
I haven't read it, but from the snippets and mentions in inter-religious and commentaries I have read, it's a 'Way' like other ways, with much in common, and much that makes it distinct.I know what I think, but curious what others think and is it from reading or experience?
Thomas thanks and good morning. What do you think about the idea that we are trying to get back to where we started? Before we took on this dual nature of spirit/divine and human. Figuring out how to make these two things within each of us work together. Completely shifting our consciousness from projected reality to the phenomenal world?I haven't read it, but from the snippets and mentions in inter-religious and commentaries I have read, it's a 'Way' like other ways, with much in common, and much that makes it distinct.
The Three Jewels of Daoism – Compassion, Frugality and Humility are pretty well normative across all traditions.
Good afternoon to you (from where I am).Thomas thanks and good morning.
I think it's a valid proposition which makes itself known in the various Traditions. Mine is 'Traditional Christian' (broadly Catholic & Orthodox) and so I would express it in those terms.So in those terms, with regard to getting back where we started, I'd offer the anthropology of St Maximus the Confessor (7th century) who proposed a triadic structure of 'being – well-being – eternal well-being'.What do you think about the idea that we are trying to get back to where we started?
Meister Eckhart says much the same thing, as do many of the Christian mystics."Still if you practice observation with a mind attached to projected reality ...
Thomas, thanks for sharing.The goal of all existence, all being, is to achieve harmony across these three domains – so, if I may make so bold, it is living, and living in harmony with the Dao that can be spoken (ell-being) and the Dao that cannot be spoken (eternal-well-being).
+++
Meister Eckhart says much the same thing, as do many of the Christian mystics.
But the point I think they are making is it's all one.
Julian of Norwich wrote:
"... For our Soul is so deep-grounded in God, and so endlessly treasured, that we may not come to the knowing thereof till we have first knowing of God ... we should know them both in one: whether we be stirred to know God or our Soul, both (these stirrings) are good and true."
(Julian of Norwich, 14th century Christian mystic, Revelations of Divine Love, Chapter XVI)
If I may paraphrase:
"... For the transient is so deep-grounded in the Eternal, and so endlessly treasured, that we may not come to the knowing thereof till we have first knowing of the Eternal ... we should know them both in one: whether we be stirred to know the Eternal or the transient, both (these stirrings) are good and true."
I think with the Tao it can be shared, but only by two people who have had the experience. if one person plays golf and knows what it feels like to hit the golf shot well, can't explain it to someone who has never heard of the game of golf, but with two people having had the experience of hitting a golf shot well, then...Auguries of Innocence
To see a world in a grain of sand
And a heaven in a wild flower,
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand
And eternity in an hour.
William Blake (written perhaps 1803, published 60 years later)
I will try and find the Dogen reference I found, that his point was doing zazen was not on the way to enlightenment, but rather doing zazen is enlightenment.
The Dao, famously, cannot be spoken – and the point is that even if one commits one's entire life to the study and practice of the Dao, and are acclaimed a master, it still cannot be spoken, the master might have a better way of expressing aspects of it; of teaching it, but it, Itself, remains inviolate.
It's an acceptance of being in the mystery, rather than trying to understand it ... ?
That's what this place is for!Thomas, thanks for sharing.
Always a tricky one, is it two, or is it three, or is it aspects of the one ...So, body, mind, spirit...
I'm assuming 'heaven, earth, man' here ... again, the job if humanity is to unite/harmonise the two.Heaven, Earth Man.
Ah ... different thing – not 'three parts of the cosmic body'.God, Christ, Holy Spirit.
We should probably discuss this in more detail, as a first reading would suggest an attempt to possess the moment, whereas the traditions might suggest be an impartial observer ...My experience this lifetime has been to when I have a moment of 'observation' to seize it and bring it into my consciousness.
... which would suggest a healing ...Resolve, acknowledge, heal whatever it is. In doing so it is removed from my energetic being. When I do this my connection with the Source grows stronger, more pure because the distortion that is created is no longer present.
... This, suggests a different reading of the 'seizing' comment.No idea where/when the end is, just happily on the journey letting what they being me surface so I can move through it.
That's a very idiosyncratic reading, as the story in the context of Near Eastern Myth and Israel's experience is the opposite?I think the story of the garden of Eden in the metaphor is one of finding our center.
Yes.I think with the Tao it can be shared, but only by two people who have had the experience. if one person plays golf and knows what it feels like to hit the golf shot well, can't explain it to someone who has never heard of the game of golf, but with two people having had the experience of hitting a golf shot well, then...
Practice, brother, practice!All descriptions of three parts of the cosmic body. How do we get these working together in harmony.
I think that's best.No idea where/when the end is, just happily on the journey letting what they being me surface so I can move through it.
That's what this place is for!
Always a tricky one, is it two, or is it three, or is it aspects of the one ...
To go back to the anthropology of Maximus again, he believed the role of humanity was to act as methorios (μεθόριος), which translates as 'boundary' , and he used the term to describe humanity's unique, cosmic role as priesthood and bridge between the physical and the spiritual realms, being both physical and spiritual entities.
Heaven, Earth Man is from Taoism. Three parts of Fu hsi trigrams. Man in the middle harmonizing heaven and Earth within himself to create this Whole ONE.I'm assuming 'heaven, earth, man' here ... again, the job if humanity is to unite/harmonise the two.
Ah ... different thing – not 'three parts of the cosmic body'.
I'll relate person experience with shifting consciousness in a separate post.We should probably discuss this in more detail, as a first reading would suggest an attempt to possess the moment, whereas the traditions might suggest be an impartial observer ...
... which would suggest a healing ...
... This, suggests a different reading of the 'seizing' comment.
That's a very idiosyncratic reading, as the story in the context of Near Eastern Myth and Israel's experience is the opposite?
And everyone does not need to play golf...if one person plays golf and knows what it feels like to hit the golf shot well, can't explain it to someone who has never heard of the game of golf, but with two people having had the experience of hitting a golf shot well, then..
The issue with the Trinity is it's a doctrine like no other:I think it is tree being combined/integrated into a working whole ONE.