Postmaster
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,312
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 0
I don't think that priest's view was heretical, especially because he is an Orthodox priest. His view might be considered heresy by Roman Catholics (but I'm not sure) and would be rejected by some Protestants, but what you've related above is much like what I have heard from other Orthodox Christians. Hell is not so much a place as it is a state of separation from God, and it's much more likely that Baha'u'llah got this from the Orthodox, rather than the other way around. It is an ancient view.
It is not heresy to accept the theory of evolution as our best explanation of how humans came to be, nor is it heresy to be scientific in one's thinking and approach to the material universe. It is not heresy to view Genesis and other parts of the Bible as metaphors for Creation: they tell us about God and our relationship with God, rather than being a textbook on the mechanics of how God created.
2 c
I think you’re correct with how Orthodox consider the after life. But to say Bahaullah stole it off Orthodoxy might not be correct. It is originally a Zoroastrian concept who was also a Persian. Which to me shows the mix and match of religion right from the start.