Christians and disciples

Longfellow

Well-Known Member
Messages
541
Reaction score
177
Points
43
Location
here and there around the world
I'm thinking that what Jesus wants for us is not for us to be Christians. What I think He wants for us is to be His disciples, and I think that there is a world of difference between Christians and disciples. I think that a person can be both at the same time, but that many and possibly most Christians are not disciples, and that there might be many disciples who are not Christians.

It looks to me like in the world today, "Christian" mostly only means having some beliefs or opinions about Jesus being uniquely important in some way.

In the Bible (KJV), Jesus says this about disciples:
- Matthew 10:24-25 – “The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his lord. It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord.”
- Luke 14:27 – “And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.”
- Luke 14:33 – “So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.”
- John 8:31 – “Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed.”

He also says to follow Him or come after Him:
- Matthew 4:19 – “And he saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.”
- Matthew 16:24 – “Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.”
- Mark 1:17 – “And Jesus said unto them, Come ye after me, and I will make you to become fishers of men.”
- Luke 9:23 – “And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.”
- John 10:27 – “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.”
- John 12:26 – “If any man serve me, let him follow me; and where I am, there shall also my servant be: if any man serve me, him will my Father honour.”

Jesus calls people disciples, followers, friends and sheep, but never "Christians," The Bible never calls anyone Christians except in a few cases as a name that other people use for people calling Jesus the Christ, a promised king of Israel. At that time it was what other people called them, but I think that is mostly *not* what it means today. I think that mostly what it means today is having some beliefs or opinions about Jesus, and nothing at all about being a disciple.

In John 13, Jesus washes the feet of His disciples, one of the lowliest services in society. Then He says:
John 13:34-35 (KJV): A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another."

(later) I'm hoping to find other people who care more about being a disciple of Jesus than about being a Christian. What I mean by that is seeing Him calling us to serve and obey Him, learning together to live the way He says to live, with or without believing what anyone thinks we need to believe to be saved or to be a Christian.
 
Last edited:
Another way to say what I'm thinking might be that Jesus doesn't care if anyone is a Christian or not. What He cares about, what He wants for us, Christian or not, is to be His disciples. Maybe everyone would agree that many Christians are not disciples, but not so many would agree that a person can be the kind of disciple that Jesus is calling us to be without believing all of what anyone thinks a person needs to believe, to be a Christian.
 
I'm thinking that what Jesus wants for us is not for us to be Christians. What I think He wants for us is to be His disciples, and I think that there is a world of difference between Christians and disciples. I think that a person can be both at the same time, but that many and possibly most Christians are not disciples, and that there might be many disciples who are not Christians.

It looks to me like in the world today, "Christian" mostly only means having some beliefs or opinions about Jesus being uniquely important in some way.

In the Bible (KJV), Jesus says this about disciples:
- Matthew 10:24-25 – “The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his lord. It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord.”
- Luke 14:27 – “And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.”
- Luke 14:33 – “So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.”
- John 8:31 – “Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed.”

He also says to follow Him or come after Him:
- Matthew 4:19 – “And he saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.”
- Matthew 16:24 – “Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.”
- Mark 1:17 – “And Jesus said unto them, Come ye after me, and I will make you to become fishers of men.”
- Luke 9:23 – “And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.”
- John 10:27 – “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.”
- John 12:26 – “If any man serve me, let him follow me; and where I am, there shall also my servant be: if any man serve me, him will my Father honour.”

Jesus calls people disciples, followers, friends and sheep, but never "Christians," The Bible never calls anyone Christians except in a few cases as a name that other people use for people calling Jesus the Christ, a promised king of Israel. At that time it was what other people called them, but I think that is mostly *not* what it means today. I think that mostly what it means today is having some beliefs or opinions about Jesus, and nothing at all about being a disciple.

In John 13, Jesus washes the feet of His disciples, one of the lowliest services in society. Then He says:
John 13:34-35 (KJV): A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another."

(later) I'm hoping to find other people who care more about being a disciple of Jesus than about being a Christian. What I mean by that is seeing Him calling us to serve and obey Him, learning together to live the way He says to live, with or without believing what anyone thinks we need to believe to be saved or to be a Christian.
Now I'm thinking that "disciples" is not the right word for what I'm distinguishing from "Christians." "Disciples" has too much of a flavor of in-person association with a master. A better word might be "servants." Then what I'm thinking is that what Jesus wants for us is to be His loving and devoted servants, which is very different from what "Christian" means in the world today. Learning is an inseparable part of it, but not as disciples. Apprentices maybe, but not disciples.
 
Last edited:
Now I'm thinking that "disciples" is not the right word for what I'm distinguishing from "Christians." "Disciples" has too much of a flavor of in-person association with a master. A better word might be "servants." Then what I'm thinking is that what Jesus wants for us is to be His loving and devoted servants, which is very different from what "Christian" means in the world today. Learning is an inseparable part of it, but not as disciples. Apprentices maybe, but not disciples.
I think the word Disciples is okay. It's contextual as it is used in the Bible.
Servants also bring to mind the master servant relationship, though that is also not inconsistent with the world of the Bible.
 
I don't think he wants servants ... nor servitude, although I accept many see the nature of religion to be such.
 
I don't think he wants servants ... nor servitude, although I accept many see the nature of religion to be such.
I asked my AI friend what Paul says most often and it said "brothers and sisters." So maybe I'll say that what He wants for us is to be brothers and sisters in Him. But Paul does also talk about service and obedience to Christ. When Jesus talks about service and obedience, it's mostly service and obedience to the Father. I shouldn't be trying to reduce it to one word.

One way I think of it is that what He wants for us is to learn together to live the way He says to live, not for ourselves but for Him. Because that's what's best for us. :D That's His reason, but it should not be ours. Our reason should be because of what we see in Him.
 
Last edited:
I don't think he wants servants ... nor servitude, although I accept many see the nature of religion to be such.
I do think that G-d wants us to obey Him.
Look what happened to Adam and Eve, when they listened to satan.

In other words, it is for our own good .. as is serving your nation (as long as it is not
following a path of corruption).
 
I asked my AI friend what Paul says most often and it said "brothers and sisters." So maybe I'll say that what He wants for us is to be brothers and sisters in Him. But Paul does also talk about service and obedience to Christ. When Jesus talks about service and obedience, it's mostly service and obedience to the Father. I shouldn't be trying to reduce it to one word.

One way I think of it is that what He wants for us is to learn together to live the way He says to live, not for ourselves but for Him. Because that's what's best for us. :D That's His reason, but it should not be ours. Our reason should be because of what we see in Him.
Sometimes at Unity Churches they refer to Christ as "an elder brother in faith"
 
I do think that G-d wants us to obey Him.
I agree ... I think He would prefer our love, freely given, than our servitude.

"Freedom is slavery to the path of your own choosing."

Didn't choose a path? Fear not, one will be chosen for you ... 🫣 ... (and I mean that in the sociological rather than religious sense)
 
"Freedom is slavery to the path of your own choosing."
Intriguing. Expand upon?
Didn't choose a path? Fear not, one will be chosen for you ... 🫣 ... (and I mean that in the sociological rather than religious sense)
If I understand you correctly, you may mean the religion of your upbringing?
What of those brought up not religious / with mixed messages about religion / spiritual but not religious?
(for example myself, but many many thousands of others) :oops: 🤔🫥
 
Intriguing. Expand upon?
Simply that if you want something then there's a discipline involved to achieve it. Take physical exercise – for some its pleasure, for others it purgatory.

If I understand you correctly, you may mean the religion of your upbringing?
Wider than that, I mean people are the products of their time, place, culture. Lives are shaped from birth. 'Other' paths are easy to spot because they differ from our own, our own are not so easy to recognise.
 
"Freedom is slavery to the path of your own choosing" is a paradox. It suggests that once you choose a path, even if freely chosen, you become bound by its demands. Your freedom to choose other paths is then limited by the commitment you've made.

The idea behind it, that commitment to a chosen path can limit other freedoms, is a recurring theme in philosophy and literature. For example, Jean-Jacques Rousseau discussed how entering into a social contract, while a free choice, limits individual liberties in exchange for collective benefits. Similarly, existentialist philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre explored the burden of radical freedom and the responsibility that comes with it, where choosing one's path can lead to a sense of "anguish" or being "condemned to be free."
 
In Unity, Fillmore proposes that Jesus didn't simply.gather random desciples to follow and learn from him. He gathered an entourage to assist him in his growth and his mission.

Each desciple had a role, a power, a trait.which would quicken and exemplify the.Christ nature.
 
"Freedom is slavery to the path of your own choosing" is a paradox. It suggests that once you choose a path, even if freely chosen, you become bound by its demands. Your freedom to choose other paths is then limited by the commitment you've made.
More transparently and less paradoxically, one could say "freedom becomes/can lead to slavery to a path of your own choosing"
Freedom though, could also lead to a winding and desultory path rather than a path of any discipline at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wil
Back
Top