Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
To help you, here is one definition:I'm quite certain that many statements attributed to Paul can sound that way. Anything in scripture that makes it sound as if people are under a command to spread the faith can be used like this. Any statement that appears to suggest that other religions are bad and or wrong (often enough in the NT or really both testaments are the stern disapprovals of pagans, though I do not recall if pagan as a term is firmly defined) The idea that the end is near which is an idea that people get out of NT material. Right next door to anything in Revelation which is NT material. And on and on.
1. An adherent of a polytheistic religion in antiquity, especially when viewed in contrast to an adherent of a monotheistic religion."
2. A Neopagan.
3. Offensive
a. One who has no religion.*
b. An adherent of a religion other than Judaism, Christianity, or Islam.*
4. A hedonist.
An item marked with * applies to Hindus, a mix of Aryan (Vedic) and indigenous religions, both of which were/are polythiestic.
Item 4 may or may not apply to a Hindu. It does not apply to me.