I would assume that important experiences of spiritual growth need not be blissful but can force us into uncomfortable spaces within and outside ourselves?
Very reasonable I think. But on what does faith rest if not an experience? Not the pure logic of the theology, right?
Experience and faith. Chicken and egg?
I doubt that:
Scientism is an ideology that promotes science as the only objective means by which society should determine normative and epistemological values.
Empiricism is a theory that states that knowledge comes only or primarily from sensory experience.
Me as well!
Don't see why that would be necessary.
I've tried to get into that head of yours, but I feel like I'm just chasing my tail. This dog is taking a nap for now.
It seems to me that you often get in situations where you feel the need to distance yourself from certain statements. "I didn't say this or that".
I'm saying that if you chose a more neutral language, a lot of side issues can be skipped to get to what you are actually trying to get at.
I'm not...
Yes, it is another thing?
He's aware of his flaws, but his flaws doesn't come into it when you talk about him. I think that's interesting. Do you think his texts have limitations?
Yeah, I'm just trying to figure out the premise of the question. You are framing this surrounding 'belief' and I'm testing what belief is here.
Your quotes seem to elude to conscious actions taken in the context of certain convictions/world-views/beliefs. I'm not saying that you are stating...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.