Can we compare physics and psychology?

coberst

Well-Known Member
Messages
427
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Can we compare physics and psychology?

Libido is an energy source—Heat is an energy source—there is potential and kinetic energy

Emotion aka instinct is an energy source—

Narcissism is a force—gravity is a force—electromagnetism is a force—within the atom there are the strong and weak forces—there are four physical forces within nature. Narcissism is a force that displays itself in--self-absorption—self-love—sense of immortality—self-esteem—cosmic significance—self-importance—feeds on symbols, on abstract ideas of my own worth

Guilt is a feeling caused by outside resistance

Feeling—the mental experience of an emotion after the body has reacted to the emotion

Neurosis is the control of anxiety by restricting experience—the humanization process is neurosis in action

Anxiety is a feeling, the penalty for becoming human, i.e. for becoming self-conscious; it is not based on instinct but is based upon individual sense of helplessness.

Ego controls responses by delaying action

Hero—the world is a stage for heroism—our main task on this earth—man’s natural yearning for organismic activity, the pleasure of incorporation and expansion, fed limitlessly in the domain of symbols—we compare one another symbolically—we are ignorant of what we want and need, we disguise it in consumption as our badges—desire to be hero is natural and to admit it is healthy—need to make me, man, nation, etc, meaningful—our need for freedom is our need to be a hero—it becomes a blind-drivenness that burns us up—we must feel that what we do is heroic—crises is when youth does not feel heroic, we have a crisis of heroism—religion is no longer a stage for heroism—heroics is a central theme of human action

Culture is a symbolic action system for heroism—to give death its due is perhaps a step back that will permit a step forward—death is reality, when we repress it what happens?—

This is how our brain works. We think with the aid of past experiences. We use linguistic metaphors to give others a direction for understanding. Our brain uses conceptual metaphors this same way; automatically using conceptual metaphors. LIFE IS A JOURNEY. Automatically our brain “copies” what we already know about journeys that help us to better comprehend the task of living.

Abstract ideas are largely metaphorical.


An infant is born and when embraced for the first time by its mother the infant experiences the sensation of warmth. In succeeding experiences the warmth is felt along with other sensations.

Empirical data verifies that there often happens a conflation of this sensation experience together with the development of a subjective (abstract) concept we can call affection. With each similar experience the infant fortifies both the sensation experience and the affection experience and a little later this conflation aspect ends and the child has these two concepts in different mental spaces.

This conflation leads us to readily recognize the metaphor ‘affection is warmth’.

Cognitive science uses metaphor in the standard usage as we are all accustomed to but it also uses a new concept that you are unfamiliar with unless you have been reading this book. This new concept is called ‘conceptual metaphor’. Conceptual metaphor is the heart of this new cognitive science and represents what will be in my opinion the new paradigm of cognitive science.

In my example I speak of two separate mental spaces; one being the experience of being held and the other is the subjective experience of affection. The theory behind the ‘conceptual metaphor’ is that the structure of the sense experience can and is often automatically without conscious intention mapped into a new mental space.

The experience structure can be mapped into a new mental space and thereby becomes part of the structure of that new mental space. In this fashion these conceptual metaphors can act somewhat like atoms that join together to make a molecule.

SGCS (Second Generation Cognitive Science) has developed new and revolutionary theories regarding how cognition works. One way that it works is through metaphor, not just linguistic but also through conceptual metaphor. You ought to give it a study. You might be surprised how many things will become clearer.

I am a retired engineer; that is why I think using physics as an aid in comprehending the world I live in.
 
Its very interesting. Cognitive is one way to go, and metaphoric is part of the picture. What about the electrical/processing aspect? We know that artificial neural networks have to be trained through repeated correction of potentials between them, but how does a biological network get trained? How does it 'Know' it is being touched, feels warm, sees a circle, hears music? Possibly through recognizing geometric ratios in the body and the world - beauty. The body is the first sensation, perhaps the heartbeat next, then the skin -- all grown according to the golden ratio. Run a finger down your arm, and you have lit up a neural training station. Last comes sight, with which you touch a much larger body, other bodies, every body.

I cannot find the original articles where I read it, but listening to music actually causes neurons at the back of the brain to fire in geometric shapes.

http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec06/ch076/ch076b.html
http://mabryonline.org/blogs/doemel/archives/2005/08/music_education.html
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-4277495.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=jUC9GAAACAAJ&dq=apprentices+of+wonder
 
Well, when you boil it all down, everything is energy.
So everything we do and think and feel has some kind of energy equation one could analyze it with.
They are doing a lot of that with the various biofeedback disciplines which are evolving.
If you subject a person to specific frequencies of energy in the right way, it is possible to elicit a response that is predictable.
 
Well, when you boil it all down, everything is energy.
So everything we do and think and feel has some kind of energy equation one could analyze it with.
They are doing a lot of that with the various biofeedback disciplines which are evolving.
If you subject a person to specific frequencies of energy in the right way, it is possible to elicit a response that is predictable.

energy psychology [havent googled it yet] which bruce lipton speaks of
[spoiled by ads] http://www.brucelipton.com/downloads/sarti111208.mp3
 
Its very interesting. Cognitive is one way to go, and metaphoric is part of the picture. What about the electrical/processing aspect? We know that artificial neural networks have to be trained through repeated correction of potentials between them, but how does a biological network get trained? How does it 'Know' it is being touched, feels warm, sees a circle, hears music? Possibly through recognizing geometric ratios in the body and the world - beauty. The body is the first sensation, perhaps the heartbeat next, then the skin -- all grown according to the golden ratio. Run a finger down your arm, and you have lit up a neural training station. Last comes sight, with which you touch a much larger body, other bodies, every body.

I cannot find the original articles where I read it, but listening to music actually causes neurons at the back of the brain to fire in geometric shapes.

Brain: Biology of the Nervous System: Merck Manual Home Edition
Mr. Doemel: Music Education Improves Academic Performance
The look of music. (research on synthetes, people with a brain condition that causes welding of senses) | Article from Science News | HighBeam Research
Apprentices of Wonder: Inside the ... - Google Book Search

I had read about the frog's brain is arranged topographically. They were able to see the neurons firing in an up down sychornization with the placement of the fly that the frog was capturing.
 
Well, when you boil it all down, everything is energy.
So everything we do and think and feel has some kind of energy equation one could analyze it with.
They are doing a lot of that with the various biofeedback disciplines which are evolving.
If you subject a person to specific frequencies of energy in the right way, it is possible to elicit a response that is predictable.


I was thinking of the libido as like a hydroelectric dam, where the potential energy of the dammed up water was the libido. The potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, which then is available for the body to take action.
 
I was thinking of the libido as like a hydroelectric dam, where the potential energy of the dammed up water was the libido. The potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, which then is available for the body to take action.
That is a good analogy.
When one considers that sexual energy can be re-directed into other interests, then the analogy works even better, kind of like flipping breakers.
 
Back
Top