Nicholas Weeks
Bodhicitta
New Federal State of China has news about CCP plans:
https://nfscofficial.com/2024/02/17/7-exclusive-intelligence-from-the-nfsc/
https://nfscofficial.com/2024/02/17/7-exclusive-intelligence-from-the-nfsc/
You have a point. Offend somebody in popular discourse and they scream, "Nazi!" Back at dear old University of Texas-Austin, I suggested someone's point of view was Stalinist. The reply? "At least he was anti-Nazi!" Examples could be multiplied.I think Mao and Stalin and Pol Pot were as evil as Hilter. Please point out how I doubted the basic claim, that communism was murderous so it warrents a "your typical reaction" aside. What they said at other sites is irrelevent.
I am just saying that you have no evidence (numbers) to back your claim that "paid little attention to, compared to the well-worn Nazi coverage." Nor does your (to you) logical claim that "publication does not mean influence on the average intellectual" (it is hard to impact the average intellectual if the idea is not discussed or published, which mine, the claim that there is little difference between the coverage of nazi versus communist genocide, is).
These are both empirical (data-driven, measureable) claims... how you you validate them?
If you look at the literature (Scholar or Nexus-Lexus) the number of articles is pretty consistent across Germany, China, Russia, Armenia, Cambodia, Rwanda, and Bosnia (the last two are more recent, so a little less).
The numbers are all within 20-30% of each other across the board.
That this is more than a "little attention" is like saying that the sales difference between GM and Ford (GM ahead by 22% or so world-wide) means Ford will go under.