Thank you for your responses. That is a great quote SacredStar.
I think that is so interesting what you posted Blue about the Professor,
I wonder if he did not want people to think he was calling an intelligent entity a God because it seems in science some think that people who believe in God outside of their work lets their belief cloud their better judgement.
The stephen hawkings quote interested me because i was thinking if you took out all the specificalities of moral codes in religion etc, you get pretty orderly systems, so one could say it is only when one goes against the pre-ordained order that they are sinning, and this usually is what makes people upset. If people see how something that is conceived as negative happens very very often and is part of the inherent order in the system--then usually it does not make them as upset, is what I have found in some cases.
If you keep trying to see everything in broader terms, you might self reflect and wonder just how Intrinsically meaningful are our classification systems and our measurements of grouping things etc=certainly they serve a purpose but can their complexity be used to point to a higher intelligence, or simply reflect our brain's ability to analyze things and systems and find order and complexity in them?
The fractals in chaotic systems, or self repeating patterns, sometims it seems if we were made by a more intelligent designer these would be seen as more specifically different, or the human brain would be able to differentiate between these patterns more specifically.
Also, Blue, what you posted makes me think about the semantics of the term "God" versus "Intelligent entity"
I wonder if he did not like to use God because it is associated with superstition? Very interesting though thank you for responding so nice!