Do you have the definition of 'scientific method'?

[badger]

Like the 'son of G-d' being G-d, you mean?

I mean that every atom and jule of energy is a part of God. Everything.

Of course, if everything is G-d, it is as if it is not defined.
You insist that 'we do not know' if the universe always existed, which makes your last statement
pretty meaningless in my view.

Every thing, force and anything else is God. That's a fairly clear definition.
Indeed, we do know know if the universe has always existed.....or not.

'Insist' is a very strong word, I think.
When people insist that their believe can only be the correct one, that can produce arguments. Arguments can produce wars.

 

[muhammad_isa]

I mean that every atom and jule of energy is a part of God. Everything.

OK, Robespierre

When people insist that their believe can only be the correct one, that can produce arguments. Arguments can produce wars.

I don't think it's so much 'the argument' as the cause .. something else.

 

[badger]

OK, Robespierre

My name is Badger.

I don't think it's so much 'the argument' as the cause .. something else.

Explanation?

 

[muhammad_isa]

Explanation?

Politics .. wealth and power.
Anyway, the OP is about the scientific method.

 

[TheLightWithin]

I think it's just fancy talk.

A google description reads:-
methodology:- a system of methods used in a particular area of study or activity.

It's not just fancy talk.

I gave you a thoughtful and thorough answer and you just glibly brush it off

Are you sincerely trying to learn?

 

[badger]

It's not just fancy talk.

I gave you a thoughtful and thorough answer and you just glibly brush it off

Indeed I did. And I showed you my reasoning with a very brief definition of methodology which Google offered me.
For your convenience I will show that again, here.......:-

I think it's just fancy talk.

A google description reads:-
methodology:- a system of methods used in a particular area of study or activity.

As you can see, the word 'methods' can be used everywhere, and anywhere. Humans just seem to love delivering unnecessary complexity.

Are you sincerely trying to learn?

Always. And I always sincerely try to teach where I can.

 

[TheLightWithin]

Indeed I did. And I showed you my reasoning with a very brief definition of methodology which Google offered me.
For your convenience I will show that again, here.......:-

I think it's just fancy talk.

A google description reads:-
methodology:- a system of methods used in a particular area of study or activity.

As you can see, the word 'methods' can be used everywhere, and anywhere. Humans just seem to love delivering unnecessary complexity.

Always. And I always sincerely try to teach where I can.

I don't think you ask questions in good faith.
There is a distinction between methods and methodology which I very kindly explained to you.
And put some thought and effort into it as well.
Maybe if I had done the PhD work I would have internalized more thoroughly and could more laboriously explain the fine details to you, but I'm not sure it would make a difference because I hypothesize that you have your mind made up.
It's not just fancy talk. I'm sorry, but you are wrong.
I don't even know why you bother to ask questions when you can so easily look things up yourself.
What are you trying to accomplish?
You did glibly brush off my answer and I resent it.
I am going to put less effort into answering your questions in the future.
If I address a topic you bring up, it will be for the sake of the topic and everyone, not to help you, because I don't think you are interested.
If you're interested in scientific terminology and the fine or technical distinctions, get on a science forum and really listen.