Longfellow
Well-Known Member
I can't find anything in the New Testament that says or even implies that the crucifixion of Jesus was a sacrifice, except possibly a few verses in Hebrews.
They would count, surely? Paul was the first Christian writer, before the gospels. Granted that Hebrews seems not to have been penned by Paul himself, but issuing from the Pauline school.possibly a few verses in Hebrews.
Jesus gave up his life. In actuality, as a suffering human being?but not as giving up something.
The lamb or sheep was a valuable animal from the herd. It was a material possession. It was currency. The killing was not about causing suffering to the animal; it was about giving a valued possession to God. The concept of sacrifice had become corrupted to mean just blood on the altar, and the sacrifice of Christ was to restore the true meaning of sacrifice, and the last blood sacrifice, replacing blood with bread and wine at the last supper.The Passover lamb, which is not the owners giving up anything. A sheep being led to slaughter, which is not the owners giving up anything. In both cases, even if the lamb suffers, that is not the point.
Didn't Jesus suffer?Jesus pays a ransom. A ransom is not a debt, and no one suffers. It's to buy freedom for people captured by other nations.
Can you be more specific?If I don't think that the crucifixion is about sacrifice, then what do I think it's about? Maybe it's about what he says it's about while it's happening: Psalm 22.
Well you clearly haven't looked hard enough.I can't find anything in the New Testament that says or even implies that the crucifixion of Jesus was a sacrifice
Did you read Psalm 22?Can you be more specific?
The final sacrifice was feeling that he had been forsaken by God. Though he had not. It made him fully human in his pain, and able to bear the pain of every human. He went through it all.
The Passover lamb and the lamb led to slaughter were not given to God. They were eaten or sold by the owners.The lamb or sheep was a valuable animal from the herd. It was a material possession. It was currency. The killing was not about causing suffering to the animal; it was about giving a valued possession to God.
Agreed.Well you clearly haven't looked hard enough.
Yes. Christ only spoke the first line. Be more specific as to your meaning and direction please? The psalm can mean a lot of different things at different times to different people., imoDid you read Psalm 22?
Yes. The passover lamb was a thanksgiving feast. Not actually a sacrifice.The Passover lamb and the lamb led to slaughter were not given to God. They were eaten or sold by the owners.
I'm saying that maybe Jesus was telling us that his crucifixion, maybe even his whole life, death and exaltation are about Psalm 22. It's for anyone who thinks that might be true to read Psalm 22 and to think for themselves about what it means.Yes. Christ only spoke the first line. Be more specific as to your meaning and direction please? The psalm can mean a lot of different things at different times to different people., imo
It's just your usual diversion and obstrufacation, imo. You never seem to have the conviction to actually say what you keep alluding to. Why should everybody have to try to decipher you? Why can't you just just post plain words? You give me a headache is all ... lolI'm saying that maybe Jesus was telling us that his crucifixion, maybe his whole life, death and exaltation are about Psalm 22. It's for everyone to read Psalm 22 and to think for themselves about what it means.
This is what riles me, that people insist on thinking that there is some hidden agenda behind what I'm saying and ignore what I'm actually saying. This is not a setup for me to say what I think about Psalm 22. If you see any possibility that Jesus could have told us from the cross what the resurrection is about, then read Psalm 22 and see what you think it means that the crucifixion is about. If not, then don't bother me asking what I think it means.It's just your usual diversion and obstrufacation, imo. You never seem to have the conviction to actually say what you keep alluding to. Why should everybody have to try to decipher you? Why can't you just just post plain words? You give me a headache is all ... lol
Oh, it riles you that everybody doesn't automatically understand your mixed up thinking?This is what riles me, that people insist on thinking that there is some hidden agenda behind what I'm saying and ignore what I'm actually saying.
You're a strange fellow, imo. Anyway -- as far as I'm concerned it's impossible to have a proper conversation with you and no longer worth the effortIf not, then don't bother me asking what I think it means.
As I said, there's ample evidence there. I'll give you a start: 1 Corinthians 5:7 "For Christ our pasch is sacrificed for us"I can't find anything in the New Testament that says or even implies that the crucifixion of Jesus was a sacrifice, except possibly a few verses in Hebrews.
This leads me to think you haven't actually searched at all. Have you heard of "the Agony in the Garden"?This time I started searching in the NT, and I didn't find anything about the crucifixion being a sacrifice in the sense of giving up something, or as agreeing to suffer as a payment or punishment. Only in the ways that I said in my previous post.
I fear your grasp of Psalm 22 might be as nebulous as your grasp of the New Testament.If I don't think that the crucifixion is about sacrifice, then what do I think it's about? Maybe it's about what he says it's about while it's happening: Psalm 22.