No essential nature
Active Member
The Buddha is thought to have died from food-poisoning.
The Dalai Lama was imprisoned by the Chinese.
According to the common view, essentially the Hindu view, for bad things to happen to good or 'Dharmic' people they must carry a kind of blame, spritual guilt akin to sin in the form of bad karma. Yet obviously the Buddha was supposed to have escaped the wheel or karma - and yet remains a causal agent?
It seems to me that karma is not in things, but in the experience of things - when the Dalai Lama was asked 'Were you ever in danger while in prison?' he said yes, but only in danger of losing compassion for his guards. Isn't this the point, not ceasing to be causal agents, nor to be unaffected by events, nor for only good things to happen. But in becoming more enlightened, to seek the good in all experiences regardless? Experience obviously includes interpreting events, and that is the basis for future action, hence the effect of how we manage the current moments experiences influences future action aswell as experience.
As I see it, only this view that karma is in experiences not events is compatable with a truly external world and with us having free will.
Reaction? Opinions?
The Dalai Lama was imprisoned by the Chinese.
According to the common view, essentially the Hindu view, for bad things to happen to good or 'Dharmic' people they must carry a kind of blame, spritual guilt akin to sin in the form of bad karma. Yet obviously the Buddha was supposed to have escaped the wheel or karma - and yet remains a causal agent?
It seems to me that karma is not in things, but in the experience of things - when the Dalai Lama was asked 'Were you ever in danger while in prison?' he said yes, but only in danger of losing compassion for his guards. Isn't this the point, not ceasing to be causal agents, nor to be unaffected by events, nor for only good things to happen. But in becoming more enlightened, to seek the good in all experiences regardless? Experience obviously includes interpreting events, and that is the basis for future action, hence the effect of how we manage the current moments experiences influences future action aswell as experience.
As I see it, only this view that karma is in experiences not events is compatable with a truly external world and with us having free will.
Reaction? Opinions?