Hi all —
I've never read Wilbur, so you must allow me to take him at 'face value' as it were. I have read the article and I think it raises some interesting and valuable points.
Before that however, I would like to comment on something Hal Blacker said at the start of the article:
"... the superficiality that pervades so much of the current spiritual exploration and discourse in the West, particularly in the United States. All too often, in the translation of the mystical traditions from the East (and elsewhere) into the American idiom, their profound depth is flattened out, their radical demand is diluted, and their potential for revolutionary transformation is squelched ... the message of the greatest teachings often seems to become transmuted from the roar of the fire of liberation into something more closely resembling the soothing burble of a California hot tub. While there are exceptions, the radical implications of the greatest teachings are thereby often lost. We wish to investigate this dilution of spirituality in the West and inquire into its causes and consequences."
Bravo! Something, I think I can unashamedly say, that I have been saying consistently with regard to the
nouvelle spiritualité!
My own twopence worth, is that the faultline sheers off from the Enlightenment, the point at which it was decided that absolute and objective reality was beyond human ken, and man is limited to the subjective, the relative and the contingent.
The result of this is that the modern West no longer accepts the data of its own traditions as given (let alone 'Revealed'), but rather more as 'plastic mediators' by which I mean the content of Scripture, for example, becomes not fixed in truth, but negotiable. The assumption is that either God does not speak, or if He does, He is incapable of expressing Himself adequately through man.
So in a sense I'm saying the West (and America) did significant damage to its own inherent traditions, before leeching onto Eastern traditions, and inflicting the same order of damage there ... the spiritual crisis that the author sees, from (presumably) a Buddhist or at least Eastern-orientated viewpoint, is the same crisis that affects Christianity, and is seen most clearly in America with the proliferation of denominations, especially those of an anti-intellectual and apocalyptic fervour.
The sum total of this process delivers us to the modern day, where man does not conform himself to truth, but rather conforms truth to himself — in effect this is not even a faith in
sola scriuptura but in
sola persona.
It is this single idea, at the very heart of 'relativism', that Christian theology challenges constantly, and it is this relativism, active in every domain of thought, that I think Blacker is addressing.
+++
Thomas
(more to follow)