Attachments....

[17th Angel]

100kb limit...? Couldn't we be a tad more generous and say.... 280 for example?

 

[Vajradhara]

100kb limit...? Couldn't we be a tad more generous and say.... 280 for example?

Namaste Alex P,

thank you for the post and suggestion.

i'll check into the ramifications of increasing the size of attachments.

metta,

~vajra

 

[seattlegal]

Namaste Alex P,

thank you for the post and suggestion.

i'll check into the ramifications of increasing the size of attachments.

metta,

~vajra

**Double take**

{Oh, wait. This isn't the Buddhist forum, it's the software feedback forum. Attachments must be taken in context, I guess. }

 

[17th Angel]

Namaste Alex P,

thank you for the post and suggestion.

i'll check into the ramifications of increasing the size of attachments.

metta,

~vajra

Thank you for the response Vajradhara.

 

[Snoopy]

**Double take**

{Oh, wait. This isn't the Buddhist forum, it's the software feedback forum. Attachments must be taken in context, I guess. }

Aye, I was expecting a sutta ref from vaj...

...maybe we'll still get one

s.

 

[Vajradhara]

Namaste all,

you know... i've got a one or two other interests

that said.. there is no current plan to increase the attachment size since the forum is undergoing some backend upgrades and maintenance. when all of that is complete the new hardware should allow for an increased attachment size.

that said, Brian has a particular vision for the forum (you'll notice no signatures and rep etc) so attachment sizes may not be on the scheduled list of changes

<obligatory Buddhist thing>

why can't a Buddhist vacume the stairs?

no attachments.

</obligatory Buddhist thing>

metta,

~v

 

[17th Angel]

Thanks for the reply.

New hardware? You mean software?

 

[Snoopy]

<obligatory Buddhist thing>

why can't a Buddhist vacume the stairs?

no attachments.

</obligatory Buddhist thing>

hehe.

s.