QueryGuy
A guy who's Baha'i
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Marsh said:Similarly, we will never be able to 'un-invent' a world government once its been established, and since we have not yet invented a system of government able to effectively govern a diverse nation, the idea of world government at this point is ludicrous and smacks of pride.
Right now we are debating theory, and if optimism is pride then so be it. I can't change the past. Humanity as a whole has done a lot of stupid and evil things. But it has also done great and wonderful things, and individuals have repeatedly risen to the challenge of improving life for as many people as possible, whether in the scientific or social arenas.
As for "effectively" governing a nation...You're going to have to clarify what you mean by that. Does that mean governing in such a way that makes everyone happy? Given your previous cynicism, I'm going to assume that you are not naive enough to think that possible. However, in terms of establishing equality among people in as many ways as possible...it takes time. Personally, I think it is a huge mistake to cease development on a macrocosmic scale simply because things can't be worked out in every microcosm. They are far, far too interconnected, as you yourself have pointed out. Things will probably never be "perfect" on any level. The most one can do is work to improve things, steadily and consistently.
And let's not forget, "world government" has already been invented. In fact is has already been implemented. It's called the United Nations. It may have once been considered pride and arrogance to suggest such a concept, but obviously enough people rose above such criticisms to make it happen. True, the U.N. doesn't begin to cover things to the extent we are talking about here, but it is, for better or worse, a form of world government in existance today.
You're right: I would rather have not set out on any path than to follow one that includes.....<insert long list of technological tragedies here>
Everything has its good and evil aspects, there's no denying that. Again, it's a matter of attitude. Do we sink into the depths of despair because of all that has happened--a past we cannot change--or do we move on and try to improve the world in what little ways we can despite the risk (or perhaps guarantee) of further tragedy? No one can avoid making that decision on some level. Perhaps you would encourage surrender, but it is totally against humanity's collective nature to do so.
QG