T

#### Tao_Equus

##### Guest

................................I didn't post it for the sake of poesy...

- Art

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter lunamoth
- Start date

T

................................I didn't post it for the sake of poesy...

- Art

T

Yeh down those lines... some way at least.Can I say "David Bohm" ?

s.

tao

Seattlegal said:will quantum fluctuations allow the infinite quality of a fractal to exist in nature? {In other words: is an infinite multiverse actually feasible in a physical way, given the (uncertain) nature of quantum fluctuations?}?

Quantum fluctuations (and subsequent duality) seem to be on a time-line that is 90 degrees from our own, mathematically an unmeasured dimension. I think that's why physicists are stuck with using statistics to describe quantum behavior. I'm not claiming to have worked with the math functions involved, just saying what it looks like to me.Tao_Equus said:On what is quantum scale to us may well be other dimensional folds that have a replicated yet unique version of our space time...and they go on infinitely.

I simply cannot imagine reality being finite. The implications of that are huge. God could not exist in the infinite except as a local event.

It seems unlikely the physical universe would ever exhaust numerical potential. The branch of Math called