"The empty mind is the devils workshop"

Perfectly evil. The walking dead. Though you attribute nothing to yourself, you are watching and permitting your actions.

Why do you still address me? I said you wanted silence, golden silence. You are free to go and be empty. :)

You always pick what you want to make the other look bad in your eyes, I have said that all arises in love - because that is the quality of the emptiness - but somehow you have judged this as evil. Evil only arises through mind, satan is the adversary, the mind is that.

Mind is the reason we retain separation from existence, Genesis says God looked at the world and it was good - do you think animals weren't killing for food, mating just because they're horny? What you have decided is evil is a concept, but looking rightly all is still good. When you can see that, you re-enter Eden, you enter the Kingdom of God, but mind won't allow it, it wants to categorize and fight to prove its validity.

When God says all is good, he means it is perfectly balanced, and it still is.
 
If you say a nonsense, it will be corrected by me, you take this as ego but it is it is because you believe if someone isn't utterly humble there must be arrogance. Mind plays these games between the extremes, mind only stops when the pendulum is halted between the two. Now there is no humility or arrogance, it is only truth.

The problem is that your reply is utter nonsense, ego-filled and arrogant. Read up on the humility of a Buber, a Rosenzweig, a Fox, a Krug, it may help that bulge.
 
Mr Lunitik,

No matter what stick and stones are thrown around,
remember that we all love the sinner . . . and hate the sin only.
 
The problem is that your reply is utter nonsense, ego-filled and arrogant. Read up on the humility of a Buber, a Rosenzweig, a Fox, a Krug, it may help that bulge.

I am neither arrogant nor humble - both are choices and thus of the ego.

Look at Jesus rightly and you see the same authority, it is the authority of the absolute flowing through the human vessel. Of course you will say there is something special about Jesus because you do not understand he is simply an enlightened man, you will say this has not happened to me, and thus you can justify disputing my words - convincing yourself you know a higher truth.

There is no higher truth, there is only deeper residing in it - ego, that which has chosen this over that, which makes decisions and identified with the form, is exactly what separates you from truth though. This illusion is exactly what you must awaken from, but you go on comparing and judging not understanding this is fueling your delusion. You will not look at me rightly because in this life I am 1/2 your age, this is naught but manifest ego - I am the alpha and omega, form makes no difference.
 
Mr Lunitik,

No matter what stick and stones are thrown around,
remember that we all love the sinner . . . and hate the sin only.

As a Hindu, what do you consider sin to be?

For me, sin is anything not done consciously, if your deed is conscious and founded on your experience of the void - emptiness - it is always good. Always, those that have attained to the absolute have been relieved of normal morals because there is a higher understanding in them...

Founded in love, how can you do anything wrong? It is absurd, and yet you call me a sinner? It is because you cannot see the depths, you only look at the peripheral still. Sin means to miss, for me your very understanding misses truth. You have delayed because you say you have things to do in life, yet you feel you are in a place to speak on truth. You cannot even trust existence to handle your responsibilities while you dive into the void and surrender to it, why do you feel you are in a position to talk on it?

It means you are lost in maya, and yet you speak like you are not - this is sin.
 
"Seeker, follow no path for every path leads there, truth is here"

Truth is already the case, only your conceptions and identifications keep you from it... let go of them all and only truth remains. Delaying, striving, it is all the mind attempting to remain the master, simply drop this stupidity and see what is the case.

Since it is already the case, it means everything has already been managed by the ultimate, you only have become identified with the activities, now you think you are the doer and so you want to keep doing it. Drop this and leave it to the absolute, all your vessel was intended for will continue uninterrupted but now there is a new dimension, you simply enjoy it.
 
As a Hindu, what do you consider sin to be?

"Sin", as per Hindu schools of philosophy, is:
the pursuit of "Pre-meditated First-Degree Bad-Karma"

Bad-Karma [aka, ugra-Karma] is bad news write from the start

Methodical pursuit of "ugra-Karma" thus risking the liability of even worse "Bad-Karma".

All occurences of sin results in unpalatable Bad-Karma repercussions.
vs.
All occurences of piety results in palatable Karma repercussions.

REMEMBER: Ignorance of the laws of Karma is no excuse.

your solicitor,

Bhaktajan esq.
 
I am neither arrogant nor humble - both are choices and thus of the ego..

From here (nowhere and nowhen reading your ponderings) it appears quite different.:)

Look at Jesus rightly and you see the same authority, it is the authority of the absolute flowing through the human vessel. Of course you will say there is something special about Jesus because you do not understand he is simply an enlightened man, you will say this has not happened to me, and thus you can justify disputing my words - convincing yourself you know a higher truth..

From here there is no authority, merely words strung together. Words filled with judgement ("you will say", "you do not understand", "you can justify"). If you look at what I wrote there was no mention of Jesus or you, only a mention of Rosenzweig (which it appears you did google). You do not have to accept him as a philosopher or a theologian or an altruist. I was merely giving bhaktijan another avenue to explore. See that is the true difference between you and I. You have a hammer, so everything looks like a nail and you just keep pounding at it. G!d provides us with an infinate number of tools to reach H!r. I do not call this "higher truth" those are your words. I just say different strokes for different folks.:cool:

There is no higher truth, there is only deeper residing in it - ego, that which has chosen this over that, which makes decisions and identified with the form, is exactly what separates you from truth though. This illusion is exactly what you must awaken from, but you go on comparing and judging not understanding this is fueling your delusion. You will not look at me rightly because in this life I am 1/2 your age, this is naught but manifest ego - I am the alpha and omega, form makes no difference.

Ah, L, it must really be quite comforting to be so certain and so sure. It is not a luxury we mortals have. INo one really cares how old you are, how many degrees you have, what language you speak, or what you believe.... I know that the Seedless Seed, the Light Within, that of G!d within will guide you home.:rolleyes:

But like Leucy7, a lot us merely want to be spared your holier-than-thou attitude.:D
 
"Sin", as per Hindu schools of philosophy, is:
the pursuit of "Pre-meditated First-Degree Bad-Karma"

Bad-Karma [aka, ugra-Karma] is bad news write from the start

Methodical pursuit of "ugra-Karma" thus risking the liability of even worse "Bad-Karma".

All occurences of sin results in unpalatable Bad-Karma repercussions.
vs.
All occurences of piety results in palatable Karma repercussions.

REMEMBER: Ignorance of the laws of Karma is no excuse.

your solicitor,

Bhaktajan esq.

Ok, and do you uphold that an enlightened man is free from karma?
 
From here (nowhere and nowhen reading your ponderings) it appears quite different.:)

Then it is your own projection.

From here there is no authority, merely words strung together. Words filled with judgement ("you will say", "you do not understand", "you can justify"). If you look at what I wrote there was no mention of Jesus or you, only a mention of Rosenzweig (which it appears you did google). You do not have to accept him as a philosopher or a theologian or an altruist. I was merely giving bhaktijan another avenue to explore. See that is the true difference between you and I. You have a hammer, so everything looks like a nail and you just keep pounding at it. G!d provides us with an infinate number of tools to reach H!r. I do not call this "higher truth" those are your words. I just say different strokes for different folks.:cool:

This is exactly why we clash on these boards, you think knowledge will help and you go on offering more and more. There is but one way to the infinite and that is to surrender the finite. You go on giving more and more materials and fueling ego's, people will look for that which upholds what they want to believe and drop what does not uphold it. This is not at all helpful, although you think it has helped you in some way. If you have experienced anything of the ultimate though, it is in spite of the knowledge you have acquired.

Ah, L, it must really be quite comforting to be so certain and so sure. It is not a luxury we mortals have. INo one really cares how old you are, how many degrees you have, what language you speak, or what you believe.... I know that the Seedless Seed, the Light Within, that of G!d within will guide you home.:rolleyes:

That light shines within me constantly and has already taken me home, I remain here to assist others. Your knowledge will cause you to think you know something about the ultimate, but it only makes your journey home more difficult, it only means there is more for you to drop when it is your time to come home as well.

It is not that I know anything, I simply know the nature of truth and wish to share that. I wish to bring all to the only destination, to cause all to see that whatsoever their path it will not help, all paths delay arrival because you are already there - it only takes some awareness, and a permitting of existence to come into your heart. Nothing mind acquires will be a help, it only means you will live more and more in the head - thus further from truth, because the head can only give you delusions, live through the heart and truth is already there.

But like Leucy7, a lot us merely want to be spared your holier-than-thou attitude.:D

I am holier than thou, because I know wholeness. It is not an ego thing, it is simply the truth, and I wish to allow all to experience the same - certainly it is not exclusive to me or any other religious speaker or founder. If your ego cannot handle that, well, so be it... I am not here to feed your ego, I am here to kill it. Many religions give you naught but opium, it numbs you to reality, if you want to take solace in that then you will miss. If you do not want assistance from me, then find someone you can trust, but always take it is a criteria: your true master will not make you feel good, he will destroy you so you can be resurrected... much as a caterpillar must be terminated for the butterfly to arise.
 
Good perfected isn't a cleansing either, though.
No, it's a new creation, or rather 'good' as the Christian tradition understands it.

Evil gives meaning to goodness, it provides a contrast, and in that it is beautiful.
Nonsense, this is the argument of relativity, and it is utterly false.

One doesn't need to taste poison to savour sweetness, one doesn't have to smell shit to appreciate perfume. One doesn't have to have seen anything, to appreciate a sunset, or listen to a jackhammer to appreciate music.

In the end it says one can only know God according to sensible things, which means one can never know God, because God is in no wise comparable to sensible things.

I love my partner, and I don't need a parade of ugly women to convince me she's beautiful; I have three kids, and I didn't need anything other than the sight of them, to know that I love them more than I thought was possible.

Contingency is dependent on the relative, but the Real is something else, and doesn't need the unreal to justify its existence.

... perfection means you are finished.
Ha! Perfection actually is the point when you can start doing something really meaningful, as opposed to demonstrate one's sense of self-importance.

If one acts perfectly, then one acts from the Principle, and it is the Principle that acts by, though, in and with, you ... all the rest is just noise in an empty vessel.

That is the problem with many religions, you create a perfect idealism and you strive for it.
No, we know the Highest, and we strive for that ... I'd rather that then settle for some pragmatic navel-gazing.

My Gaelic ancestors brought Christianity to Europe after the fall of Rome. What they brought was an adventure beyond compare. 'Why be a Christian?', 'For the craic!" one might say, or 'Because there's no other challenge imaginable that comes anywhere close!'

Or, 'why seekest thou God?' to which the answer is 'Because he is!'

We've lost that sense of discovery, of adventure ... the most oft-used phrase in the Bible is 'fear not', but that's just what we do.

The ideal is simply impossible, the more you strive, the more you will become frustrated.
Good Lord ... you have been mixing with some odd people!

Who has ever created more evil than those striving for good?
Oh, good grief ... what has happened to Lunitik since I last spoke? You've been replaced by a replica, but it's not you at all ... or I misjudged you before?

Those striving for evil, perhaps?

... it is better to be in the middle...
The cry of the mediocre.

God bless,

Thomas
 
One doesn't need to taste poison to savour sweetness, one doesn't have to smell shit to appreciate perfume. One doesn't have to have seen anything, to appreciate a sunset, or listen to a jackhammer to appreciate music.

Eat a cake and then drink sweet tea - the sweetness is gone. With bitterness, however, the sweetness will be exquisite. You jump from sweetness to poison, how are they even related? It is an absurd jump, you have not understand the true opposite here. If everywhere, there is perfume, you will never appreciate it, you will only stop and notice if it is different to normal experience. Constantly, there are smells all around, but we do not notice most of them. If one has seen nothing, they will not see the sunset, how will it be possible? Life itself is a cacophony, this is why music appeals, it brings us to a certain harmony.

In the end it says one can only know God according to sensible things, which means one can never know God, because God is in no wise comparable to sensible things.

The dance of the opposites is in no way sensible, it is quite illogical and many faith systems try to make sense of it and ultimately fail. God can be known through trascendence of the opposites, it is the only way. If you do not understand the opposites to be complimentary then for me you have not known God, you are merely a believer.

I love my partner, and I don't need a parade of ugly women to convince me she's beautiful; I have three kids, and I didn't need anything other than the sight of them, to know that I love them more than I thought was possible.

Love makes you blind to all else, love causes something in you to see the glowing of the other. Yet, you can be angry towards them, you can feel hate arising - it has to be so, because it creates the dance. Love is a drawing in, hate is a pushing away. Without the hate you cannot rekindle the love, there is no depth in the relationship. They are founded in something deeper than love, and thus can withstand the anger that arises, can even be strengthened by that anger. If you fear that anger then really you fear the love, maybe you think it cannot withstand, maybe you are not sure it is real love. Otherwise there is no problem.

Contingency is dependent on the relative, but the Real is something else, and doesn't need the unreal to justify its existence.

Does it not? Do you not see that the unreal is a contrast to the real? Without the unreal, the real simply has no meaning at all. To appreciate anything, you have to know its opposite, else you will take it for granted - this is absolutely fundamental to life, indeed the reason why death is there. Yet, that which is not relative can be found, can be resided in, but you have to understand the dance to partake in the non-relative. You will have to notice that you are unchanging through the constant change, something in you remains the same. Looking more deeply into this, truth arises of its own accord.


Ha! Perfection actually is the point when you can start doing something really meaningful, as opposed to demonstrate one's sense of self-importance.

If something is perfect, it is done... what more then can be done? It is finished, it is no longer important at all. You move on to the next thing because there is nothing more to be done here. Of course the one thing that marries the Abrahamic faiths together is the believe in the destruction of this place, it is absolutely going to happen if we continue to insist on the ideal.

If one acts perfectly, then one acts from the Principle, and it is the Principle that acts by, though, in and with, you ... all the rest is just noise in an empty vessel.

I agree, and yet it is not a perfection, it is a purification. It is to clean away all that is false, and all conceptions and ideals are always false. The Principle is oneness, but oneness cannot be manifest without the dance of opposites. In absolute balance is the perfection, and the understanding of that is holiness. You can divide existence and become a saint or a sinner, but both are egoistic, transcend this and you understand both are necessary.

No, we know the Highest, and we strive for that ... I'd rather that then settle for some pragmatic navel-gazing.

There is no higher or lower in oneness, it is something of the mind to even consider comparison. Mind chooses what it would rather, heart simply accepts what is. You do not even understand what navel gazing is yet you condemn it - it is to look at death within yourself, and only in death can there be a ressurection. If there is no death, there can be no rebirth.

Good Lord ... you have been mixing with some odd people!

Yet I am perfectly true, look at the middle east, they are striving absolutely for their ideal and most all of them wish their own death. It is easy to throw away life when it is a hell, and that is what their ideal has created. It is the same in Communist countries, there is a very high ideal but all of the people suffer. In the West there is nothing like an ideal other than freedom, and this is the only true ideal. When your ideal is to make the world good you create a prison, you give people restrictions, you take away their liberty. Man will never settle for anything less than absolute freedom because he knows his being is free.

Oh, good grief ... what has happened to Lunitik since I last spoke? You've been replaced by a replica, but it's not you at all ... or I misjudged you before?

Look at the dark ages in Christian history, this was in the name of the highest goodness, yet anyone can see it is absolutely evil. Look clearly and you can understand, but if you look through a Christian mask you may not comprehend what I'm saying.

Those striving for evil, perhaps?

Those striving for good are no different than those striving for evil, both are caught up in the mind. Transcend this and you are face to face with what you have called God, only then is there no more need to imagine and idealize.

The cry of the mediocre.

As apposed to the ego which wants to be something, to prove his life is meaningful, yet Jesus has said unless you hate your own life you cannot be his disciple. He means that unless you renounce all striving, you cannot enter the Kingdom, desire itself keeps you away from the divine, it is the very nature of difficulty.

Be Jesus' disciple, not merely a believer, mind has chosen this path and it is perfectly good, but you will have to drop yourself to come close to him. You will have to be crucified to rise again, it will be your ego that dies though, not you. It is only that you are too much identified with it so it will bring fear, simply watch and go deeper until Christ arises in you. Then you are no more a Christian, no more are there such absurd choices, you understand your nature and can say yourself "I and my father are one".
 
Ok, and do you uphold that an enlightened man is free from karma?

That is the percise perdicament that Arjuna found himself in.

It is Arjuna's confusion over this precise question that the Gita was spoken. Never the less he was to preform those duties alloted him.

Originally Posted by Lunitik
Who has ever created more evil than those striving for good?

Originally Posted by Thomas
Those striving for evil, perhaps?

The "Mind" is different from "Intelligence" [mana vs budhi]
Each has specific functions.

Don't conflate the 'empassioned dictums' of one . . . for the 'best judgements' of the other.

Intelligence means being able to "discern subtle differences",
ie: cheese vs butter; motor oil vs olive oil.
2 + 2 vs 22. This is similar to the tasks assigned to a Court Magestrate.

The minds' attribute is "desiring and rejecting"
 
That is the percise perdicament that Arjuna found himself in.

It is Arjuna's confusion over this precise question that the Gita was spoken. Never the less he was to preform those duties alloted him.

It just seems to me that you are more for Arjuna than Krishna when you speak here, I have said before that Arjuna represents the past which Krishna is assigned with correcting. Much of Krishna's deeds can be seen as sinful, but he is simply partaking in the leela without choosing anything. You say he is entitled to certain things because he is God incarnate, you do not realize that you are as well. This is the conclusion of Advaita Vedanta, which comes perhaps even closer than Buddha to saying logically what is the case. In absolute oneness of the void, what else can be the case?

The "Mind" is different from "Intelligence" [mana vs budhi]
Each has specific functions.

Don't conflate the 'empassioned dictums' of one . . . for the 'best judgements' of the other.

Intelligence means being able to "discern subtle differences",
ie: cheese vs butter; motor oil vs olive oil.
2 + 2 vs 22. This is similar to the tasks assigned to a Court Magestrate.

The minds' attribute is "desiring and rejecting"

We do not disagree, just different terminology. Bodhi comes only from the void, it is that non-being flowing through the being, the formless flowing through the form. All else is mind, it is against the surrender of distinction, attempts at proving the validity of your separateness. This is the nature of maya, you are not something separate, you are the void manifest.

This is the navel gazing which was brought up earlier, it is the realization of that emptiness within yourself, the embracing of the divine in the animal. Deep stomach breathing will stimulate the hara center, when it is noticeable, direct your whole consciousness at it. You will feel you are going to die, keep going, eventually almost as a popping something seems to leave you - what leaves is the ego, the false self, the soul. Now only truth remains, this is Samadhi, resting in the void.
 
Hi Lunitik —
Eat a cake and then drink sweet tea ...
What you're doing is determining the higher according to conditions that prevail at the most contingent, the most finite and the most relative level ... you're doing exactly what you keep informing everyone else they're doing, that is standing within and being governed by duality.

Love makes you blind to all else...
No, that's not love at all, that's delusion.

True love is to see beyond all contingent determination.

love causes something in you to see the glowing of the other.
No, you're still viewing 'love' as the object of your gaze and your attention.

True love is the gift of self by the opening of the heart to the other. You do not see the beloved 'out there', you know the beloved 'in here', by giving yourself to them. The two become, in Biblical terms, as one flesh.

Yet, you can be angry towards them, you can feel hate arising - it has to be so, because it creates the dance.
Nonsense. If you think that, then everything you think is conditional and relative and dependent upon everything else.

By your account, if you stopped hating someone, you would no longer be able to love them.

You're saying the only way to know pleasure is to know pain first. That's like the guy banging his head on the wall: "What are you doing that for?"
"Because it feels good when I stop ... "

God bless,

Thomas
 
What you're doing is determining the higher according to conditions that prevail at the most contingent, the most finite and the most relative level ... you're doing exactly what you keep informing everyone else they're doing, that is standing within and being governed by duality.

No, I am simply showing that duality is the nature of this place. You can reside in oneness, but still you will watch the duality of this place until the day you die. Existence cannot function without the dance of the opposites, always they are moving as a circle, cycles upon cycles. If you try to repress half the circle the other is no more possible, you begin to become less and less alive because the circulatory nature of things is stopped. You can stand outside it and watch, but if you simply do not permit the dance then you will be dead because even the systems within the body move in the same cycles - blood, breath, just examples of all the cycles.

True love is the gift of self by the opening of the heart to the other. You do not see the beloved 'out there', you know the beloved 'in here', by giving yourself to them. The two become, in Biblical terms, as one flesh.

Love is what we call the experience of oneness, that subtle merging. It is known when the heart chakra is opened - which is what has happened if you have experienced grace. In this there is no "in here" though, there is no distinction between the two. I highly doubt the Bible says they become one flesh, perhaps one body but then you have misunderstood what this means.

Nonsense. If you think that, then everything you think is conditional and relative and dependent upon everything else.

Everything in the manifest world IS relative and interdependent, EVERYTHING. To deny this is to delude yourself. I am saying it is impossible to love without hate being there, certainly, and in fact hate merely shows your passion for the other, this is why many significant others will try to get under your skin - simply to show that you actually love, if you have no investment it will not bother you at all. Anger shows you are emotionally involved, love is not so consoling for people because it is easily faked.

You're saying the only way to know pleasure is to know pain first. That's like the guy banging his head on the wall: "What are you doing that for?"
"Because it feels good when I stop ... "

Not at all, I am saying the only way to appreciate pleasure is through having experienced pain. If pleasure was a constant, you would take it for granted, it would become meaningless to you. You can make absurd examples all you want, but your denial shows by itself you do not understand life very much.

Truth is non-dual, but truth is the unmanifest. Existence is a hint, it is not the real, but this is the whole problem with the Christian world - somehow they have become very materialistic. When you transcend the opposites, you can know the real, but you will have to still function in the dual until your death - until then, everything remains relative. This is why we go on saying God is something unknowable, we can find that we are a part, but to know the whole without relativity is impossible - our experience of oneness will be from our relative position.

Christians become absolutely identified with the body, and I feel this is because they are taught their body will be raised again in the end times. Science tells us matter is not real, but rather a perception. This is an important statement from the science world when we bring it into the spiritual world, it means the material is simply false. Now we can play here, knowing it is all an illusion, because it is not really real at all. Still, the Western world has decided the exact opposite, that the spiritual world is false, that we are biological accidents and then we turn to religion for meaning. It is a wrong approach, this very place is heaven if you have eyes to see, we are already celestial beings if you can look rightly.

This might look dualistic, denying the flesh, the material. It is simply to look beyond delusion, I do not deny anything of this place, I enjoy it to the utmost. I simply see it rightly... Christians want eternal life, but they want it after life, this is just stupidity, this very moment is eternal if you can transcend it. Seeing this life and the after life as two is dualistic, you are already a spiritual body, flesh is an illusion, see it and rejoice.
 
No, I am simply showing that duality is the nature of this place.
That's a dualist way of looking. I see it as holistic. It's because you're thinking is shaped by your dualist outlook that you see everything as either absolutely this or absolutely that. Even your 'oneness' is determined by duality.

Grief, Lunitik, listen to yourself. You're more dogmatic than a theologian of moral theology, and coming from a Catholic, that's saying something!

I highly doubt the Bible says they become one flesh, perhaps one body but then you have misunderstood what this means.
Or perhaps, on the basis that Sacred Scripture has inspired some of the greatest saints and sages to every walk this earth, the misunderstanding is yours.

The fact that you choose to criticise something that you do not know is telling.

Everything in the manifest world IS relative and interdependent, EVERYTHING.
Yes, and if you understood that deeply, you would begin to appreciate the wonder of that which we call being, and its gift.

I am saying it is impossible to love without hate being there...
I know you are, and yet God is love, but God is not hate. So what you call love is not the quality of that of which Scripture speaks. Your love is a dependency (on its contrary). Your love is contingent and relative and ephemeral ... whereas Divine Love, if you could only see it, is transcendent.

Not at all, I am saying the only way to appreciate pleasure is through having experienced pain.
And I am saying only if your are founded in duality. All your examples are drawn from an explicit and fundamentally dualistic order of experience. You cannot see of accept anything that is not founded in duality. Duality for you is a necessary determination of being. This is real for you, but it is not binding on everyone.

This might look dualistic...
Because it is.

Your 'oneness' is not truly what you insist it is. You think you have overcome duality, but you haven't, you've simply adopted its contrary position. Your 'oneness' is only meaningful as the contrary of duality.

God bless,

Thomas
 
That's a dualist way of looking. I see it as holistic. It's because you're thinking is shaped by your dualist outlook that you see everything as either absolutely this or absolutely that. Even your 'oneness' is determined by duality.

You do not experience it as holistic though, your statement is purely idealogical. All thinking is founded in duality because a duality is necessary for thought to even arise, mind has to be there, the pendulum has to be moving. I do not see anything as absolutely this or that - it is neither. Oneness cannot be attained without understanding duality, that is the whole point of this existence, to show us duality and allow us to overcome it. To simply ignore duality - even if you have attained to non-duality - is simply ignorant. To convey to anyone, you must recognize the other, this is duality. Oneness is experienceable whensoever you like, but then all else fades away, mind stops and you enter your being.

Grief, Lunitik, listen to yourself. You're more dogmatic than a theologian of moral theology, and coming from a Catholic, that's saying something!

I have no dogma at all, though, I simply convey truth in response to your words and you have taken this as a system of belief on my part. It is fine if you wish to view it this way, you have been looking for a pattern in my words and thus you see a dogma. You are objectifying me, you are deciding what my attributes are, you have erred for I am attributeless. I am as the stick of the tight rope walker, as you veer left I go right to allow you balance. It is because you are predictable and consistent that I seem that way, for me it is simply becoming monotonous.

Or perhaps, on the basis that Sacred Scripture has inspired some of the greatest saints and sages to every walk this earth, the misunderstanding is yours.

Like who? I can name maybe two or three total. Then, they would never consider themselves great, they would consider themselves nothing. Christianity has produced many theologians, but very few who have actually known, that have actually gone to the peak - the few that have are considered heretic by many. This seems utterly egoistic of you to even state, you believe your tradition to be the highest because it means you're on the highest path. It is simply false, and merely shows your own identification and attachment.

The fact that you choose to criticise something that you do not know is telling.

Your assumption that I do not know is quite telling as well.

Yes, and if you understood that deeply, you would begin to appreciate the wonder of that which we call being, and its gift.

Again, your arrogance.

I know you are, and yet God is love, but God is not hate. So what you call love is not the quality of that of which Scripture speaks. Your love is a dependency (on its contrary). Your love is contingent and relative and ephemeral ... whereas Divine Love, if you could only see it, is transcendent.

It is not my notion of love at all, and yet God is frequently angry, he has hated many things, the whole Bible goes on discussing his jealousy and other similar qualities. What a strange thing that you say he is not hate, and yet do not see my point that true love needs the contrast. You make God some ideal when he is not, you ignore the very Genesis of human folly: the knowledge of good and evil. You want to go towards good and love, but the Bible is filled with something of a higher love, love which knows no distinction, that can be fierce and gentle - in short, you have not transcended the opposites, you have chosen sides.

And I am saying only if your are founded in duality. All your examples are drawn from an explicit and fundamentally dualistic order of experience. You cannot see of accept anything that is not founded in duality. Duality for you is a necessary determination of being. This is real for you, but it is not binding on everyone.

My words are dual because language necessitates it, it says nothing of me or my experience, but your inability to see the truth in what I convey shows you have not experienced non-duality yourself. The one that has seen non-duality accepts the opposites because he is separate from them. He allows their play because he has gone beyond them, he does not choose one pole or the other because he understands both are valid but truth is neither. You have not come to this understanding, for you it is still something theoretical, you still function within the limitation of the human mind.

Your 'oneness' is not truly what you insist it is. You think you have overcome duality, but you haven't, you've simply adopted its contrary position. Your 'oneness' is only meaningful as the contrary of duality.

It is not an overcoming, that is not what is meant by transcendence. Transcendence is a deep acceptance and understanding, but can you even imagine preparing food when you cannot see where you end and the food begins? If you attempt this in the non-dual state, you will feel you are cutting yourself, you will feel yourself heating up, you will be chewing yourself. The whole thing would be an utter mess and almost an impossible task. No, this is not what it is like, but whensoever you wish to enter the state you can. There is a certain illumination in your sight in normal activity, but to enter the state there must be absolute non-action. You can reside in the being at all times, but your perception will still display duality simply to allow you to function.
 
Non-duality is neither clinging to happiness nor sadness, neither to peace nor war, neither to love nor hate, neither good nor evil, neither life nor death, neither form nor formless, neither being nor non-being, neither this nor that. You are detached from the whole thing, you enjoy the dance but you are not part of any of the dances, you observe the cycles but are outside all wheels. What to say of it? It is simply truth, but to understand you must go to the peak yourself.

You still uphold the fundamental duality of most religious people: you consider yourself and God distinct. This alone shows you have not realized your true nature, the very fact you still have this concept shows you remain in duality. It is said of Jesus that he is fully human and fully divine, you do not know it is true of you as well. Yet, every time Jesus talks to another, he has embraced duality to do so. It is only when he leaves to pray alone that he enters the non-dual state. You consider this man uniquely special, it is not so, many have come to this same peak. It is, for me, a depressing thing that this is not widespread, that we still consider it something special at all - it should be exactly the purpose of our education system, to draw out our Godhood, then we can proceed compassionately to assist our communities, learning the necessary skills, but this should be the initial focus. When it is the norm, man will flourish, but as it is he only moves in hate, in attempts to get one over on the other, it is disgusting.

Always it is regarded that such people have become either crazy, or to the few a special being. Cults arise because people are wowed too easily by mystics or by passions related to religion. It should not be so, this peak should not be hidden, but if it is not hidden then we see how average the Jesus' et al really were, how it is each of our potentials to even go higher. Jesus himself says others will exceed him, but still it does not happen in Christianity, maybe Francis of Assisi, certainly Meister Eckhart, but mostly Christians remain mediocre spiritually. Belief is relied on too heavily, too much Christians are involved in the worldly affairs, always priests are talking about bettering yourself, not teaching that you are a non-self.

The Holy Spirit needs to be more emphasized by Christians, it means dropping yourself utterly and accepting God, realizing God was always your true nature. Now you are no more separate, it is beautiful, but I do not sense it in even the priests. Always, they are full of pride, and they try to feel the egos of the church, how puzzling.
 
I meant they fuel the ego's, not feel.

Then, it is quite normal, who will come to you if you are saying to them that they must die to themselves? That they must drop all their desires and cease all will, that they must simply allow the current of life, the Holy Spirit to guide them wheresoever it wishes. You have to make them feel good about themselves for them to keep coming and giving you money, you have to lift their spirits not lead them to a kind of death. It is utterly wrong, and now they are saying that priests are necessary to have a dialog with God... this has to be the last straw, he is needed for you to reach yourself? It is absurd levels of stupidity, so I cannot blame the Christians, they do not know better. I only seek to point all in the right direction, to drop all this nonsense and simply go directly. Do not accept my words, simply ask God to guide you to truth with all your being and he will carry you, then allow all the signs he points out to you, do not allow mind to tell you this doesn't comply with your understanding - you don't understand.
 
Back
Top