Zen

Angels if you like.

I believe life is everywhere
What is your definition of life?

Beyond mold, lichen, bacteria? Typically to classify as life, it grows, adapts, reproduces, has biology, passes genetic material to offspring.

It appears you may have another defintion.
 
What is your definition of life?
When in doubt, revert to dictionary definitions?
What is your definition of energy?

Beyond mold, lichen, bacteria? Typically to classify as life, it grows, adapts, reproduces, has biology, passes genetic material to offspring.
Terrestrial carbon based life, you mean?

It appears you may have another defintion.
Living energy, at the drop of a hat. The planet Earth is a living entity, whatever the dictionary says.

There is life around us all the time. Dimensions interwoven. My Father's house has many mansions.
 
Last edited:
When in doubt, revert to dictionary definitions?

. The planet Earth is a living entity, whatever the dictionary says..
i would have to find your dictionary!

The planet earth is not a dictionary definition of living, it contains life, life lives on it, I did not take you for a Gaya new ager...

Reproduces, has cells, mitochondria, offspring with genetic material?

You are proposing a different definition of life than the conventional...(speaking from someone accused of and known to be unconventional)

Having a common language does benefit us.

Angels, Planet earth itself is life, everything in the universe is life? I need explanation.
 
Firstly then 'science' has to know what constitutes a whole human being -- not just the physical brain and body, which is all science can measure? And because that's all science can measure, science concludes that's (probably) all there is ... until perhaps in the future science can find a way to measure more?
Yes, exactly that. It's the best theory science currently has, and will be replaced if new science supports a different one.
Have you ever had a 'supernatural' experience or encounter? Have you ever had a prophetic dream? Or a prayer clearly answered?

If not how can 'materialists' speak for folks who have? And just dismiss their spiritual experiences as the mind playing tricks?
Yes I have, a number of experiences. I don't dismiss them, I entertain parallel explanations since I have no clear way to determine which is more valid.
@Bloodshot
If it is not actually your view that everyone and anyone who has had what they believe is a genuine 'psychic' or spiritual experience is misled by their own mind, then I apologise.
No apology needed :) I wouldn't dismiss anyone's experience. That's all any of have to go on after all, but as I said earlier, all experiential evidence should be considered dubious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJM
.. a reasonable argument for their belief.
A belief in God is not unreasonable, illogical or irrational – it's a faith position.
That brings us to question as to what is reasonable.
Faith, all arguments fail against that, illogical or irrational, is beyond scrutiny.
It's the best theory science currently has, and will be replaced if new science supports a different one.
Use may be, instead.
My Father's house has many mansions.
Is that grammatically correct? A house is a house, how can it have many mansions? Your fathers house can have many rooms. ;)
Brunei Sultan's (Hassanal Bolkiah Muiz'zaddin Wad'daulah) palace has 1,800 rooms.
 
Last edited:
Do you remember how back in January 2022 I pointed out that your use, in a post, of this line from Psalm 46 was based on a great sounding, but inadequate translation of the line? Do you recall how almost almost two years later, in December 2023, when you used the same translation as the title of a thread I reminded you of my earlier response?

Just wondering.
Can you link to a more reliable translation?
 
You keep your pies in a safe?! Are you from Wigan?
Pie safes are cool... rustic even
1786510019744.png
 
Do they? If so then why do the majority follow what they were taught at home?
You'd have to survey them. I think some people think the beliefs are factual.
Things that we learn as children have a huge effect on our developing brain... and selfhood
I wasn't even exactly raised religious, and I've had a decent amount of education and a pretty good sense that the results of scientific investigation do the best job of explaining the physical reality we all know, yet as to religion I still feel most comfortable somewhere amongst the 3 marginally compatible belief systems of the 3 adults in my household.
 
Doesn't the tetragrammaton essentially say "I am that I am"
Or "I will be what I will be"
Or "The Self Existent One"
Talking about something else here
The Anthropic Principle

Unless there are some metaphysical or transcendent laws that have predictable consequences like physical laws do
Bingo! Thanks. They just don't get it

Can you link to a more reliable translation?
It's not about the translation, but about the interpretation of the meaning of the phrase "Be still and know that I am God" in context of psalm 46. Hebrew scholars of the Torah (in this case actually the Writings) have always taken it to be a warning to Israel's enemies not to attack because God protects Israel and they will be routed and defeated.

The 'zen' interpretation may be valid enough for the phrase in English taken out out of context, but it is not the interpretation that Hebrew scholars have always followed.

No apology needed :) I wouldn't dismiss anyone's experience. That's all any of have to go on after all, but as I said earlier, all experiential evidence should be considered dubious.
Thank you. :) There is continuing dispute, for instance, about Paul's experience on the road to Damascus. It can't be resolved except by the effect it had upon him, and the influence on the world since. Hard atheists poo-poo it as schizophrenia or whatever, because of course they must
 
Last edited:
Is that grammatically correct? A house is a house, how can it have many mansions? Your fathers house can have many rooms. ;)
Brunei Sultan's (Hassanal Bolkiah Muiz'zaddin Wad'daulah) palace has 1,800 rooms
'My Father's house has many mansions' means to me that spiritual dimension contains and surrounds and permeates our material dimension of nature but is not contained by it.

Spirit ‘weaves’ nature. It’s Plato’s cave and all material manifestations are reflections of one spiritual reality.

The I Ching has the perfect polarities of the ‘uncreated world’ permeating the mixed-up polarities of the ‘created world’.*

There may be infinite other dimensions (rooms) within the house of spirit, not just our time/space dimension of nature.

IMO

(*With only the fire/water polarity intact, but shifted from the horizontal in the uncreated world arrangement, to the vertical in the created world arrangement, substituting for the perfect yin/yang vertical polarity in the uncreated arrangement.)



.
 
Last edited:
Unless there are some metaphysical or transcendent laws that have predictable consequences like physical laws do
If we can make falsifiable predictions about them, we can "do science" on them, surely? They must be governed by a set of rules to be predictable, to behave consistently. Just like physics.
 
That brings us to question as to what is reasonable.
Faith, all arguments fail against that, illogical or irrational, is beyond scrutiny.
And yet reasoned arguments for faith abound.
 
And yet reasoned arguments for faith abound.
I have never encountered any. Atheists have not encountered it. Tell us of one.
"Since we do not 'exactly' know how universe came about, therefore, God."
Is that what you mean by a reasoned argument?
 
Spirit ‘weaves’ nature. It’s Plato’s cave and all material manifestations are reflections of one spiritual reality.

The I Ching has the perfect polarities of the ‘uncreated world’ (Early Heaven) permeating the mixed-up polarities of the ‘created world’ (Later Heaven)

With only the fire/water polarity intact, but shifted from the horizontal in the uncreated world (Early) arrangement, to the vertical in the created world (Later) arrangement, substituting for the perfect yin/yang vertical polarity in the uncreated (Early Heaven) arrangement.)

I agree to reflections of one reality, but that is physical. Nothing spiritual there. The word is an unneeded insertion of religions.
Is the I Ching religion?

Trigrams.png
 
Last edited:
I have never encountered any. Atheists have not encountered it.
I feel the same way about atheists! 🤣

In the end, both are arguing from faith rather than evidence, because the question lies outside the empirical.

"Since we do not 'exactly' know how universe came about, therefore, God."
No-one so far knows 'exactly' how the universe came about.

God is not about the 'how' of it, but the 'why'.

So the science and the theology walk hand in hard, each addressing their own.

Is that what you mean by a reasoned argument?
For what it's worth.
 
Back
Top